Off Topic Prince Andrew

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
brb said:
Ah but see, it's not irrelevant, it just means you don't know the law <laugh>

The reason I said he was old enough to be her dad (which is true) in Florida, age difference does matter, when it comes to committing an offence under Florida law.

No, she wasn't a whore, she was prostituted. So not only are you shhite at knowing the law, nor do you understand the term grooming.

Happy to help as always.
Click to expand...
So it's down to state laws?

She was a whore, and going by the pics was under no duress.. Seeing as she met him 3 times (apparently)
 
Commachio said:
So it's down to state laws?

She was a whore, and going by the pics was under no duress.. Seeing as she met him 3 times (apparently)
Click to expand...

Some people are just harder to educate than others, but at least I do try.

Im sure when a guy is kneeling in an orange suit, he smiles nicely for the camera, to demonstrate he is being treated well by his captors. However, his captors also like to play the camera, and a few days later he will be minus his head.

The moral of the story being a camera does lie. But if it makes you happier that for **** Andrew and Co, she was a whore, who am i to argue with your sad misguided judgement.
 
brb said:
Some people are just harder to educate than others, but at least I do try.

Im sure when a guy is kneeling in an orange suit, he smiles nicely for the camera, to demonstrate he is being treated well by his captors. However, his captors also like to play the camera, and a few days later he will be minus his head.

The moral of the story being a camera does lie. But if it makes you happier that for **** Andrew and Co, she was a whore, who am i to argue with your sad misguided judgement.
Click to expand...
Are you saying she wasn't a whore then?


it'ss that time of night again<laugh>
 
Tbf this aint the 1st time comm has backed a peedo.:bandit:
You must log in or register to see images
 
As some seem keen on facts, a quick point of information. This will no doubt be followed by the usual whataboutery, abuse and claims I'm defending him, despite raising it several times along with the other frequent flyers on the Lolita Express and UK Government cover ups, back when it didn't suit some peoples political agenda. :emoticon-0105-wink:

From the evidence, Prince Andrew is not a '****'.

****phile - prepubescent.
hebephile - 11-14 years of age.
ephebophile - 15 - 16 years of age.
teleiophile > 17years of age.
gerentophile - Rooneys.

Carry on. <ok>
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Ginger Marks
Libby said:
Would you say the same if it was a 15 year old here?
Click to expand...

No ... but if she was a 16 year old here we wouldn't even be having the debate about her age.

For me, she was used as a plaything of the powerful and that in itself is very wrong and Andrew showed very poor judgement ... but I fail to see that he forced her into anything ... Epstein is very different.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: The Ginger Marks and Spurlock
FosseFilberto said:
No ... but if she was a 16 year old here we wouldn't even be having the debate about her age.

For me, she was used as a plaything of the powerful and that in itself is very wrong and Andrew showed very poor judgement ... but I fail to see that he forcedher into anything ... Epstein is very different.
Click to expand...

Well we probably would, just not from a legal standpoint though I take your point.

He might not have physically forced her, but there seems to be evidence that he knew what was going on there and is therefore complicit imo.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tobes, Stan and FosseFilberto
West WindsR said:
There’s an obvious response here but it’s a nailed on ban and no one wants that.
Click to expand...


Is that about someone being so knowledgeable about the subject matter of age of consent, as if they have studied this... for educational purposes only, honest guv?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Stan
Libby said:
Well we probably would, just not from a legal standpoint though I take your point.

He might not have physically forced her, but there seems to be evidence that he knew what was going on there and is therefore complicit imo.
Click to expand...

It doesn’t sound like she had a lot of say in the matter. It’s all rather rapey in my uneducated view but I’m sure there’s a very intelligent technical definition which someone can provide while definitely not defending it or attention-seeking.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DerekTheMole, Tobes, Stan and 1 other person
My problem in all this is that she gets off scotch free...she wasn't walking home from work through the park and got raped...she was in an environment she ****in knew about...she was milking the positives of it be it glamour, potential wealth...let's call it networking

Even a tramp stealing from Primark gets put on some kind of programme

I'm not sympathising with her like I would for that poor woman minding her own getting raped

She was in that circle....it will have been a sexual hubub...plenty innuendo....why didn't she open the front door and go home? Why didn't she just **** off and work in McDonald's for the summer?

Personally I think it's another female milking her youth, prowess and beauty and she got stung

None of this has defended Andy...bit she's not getting off for nothing in the not606 court, im afraid
 
  • Like
Reactions: BillyBobBallbag
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom
Back