You must log in or register to see images
Talk Norwich City@TalkNorwichCity
Cambridge last year. Luton this year. Love having our better players kicked to bits in pre-season games. Nothing quite like it
My gripe is that if we pay a hefty loan fee and wages that money may have been better spent on a permanent signing.With the exception to the injury to Rhodes and the sloppiness in conceding a goal, somy VERY positive outcome from last night's game. The emergence of Aarons, Godfrey and Cantwell doesn't surprise me, as I've seen them play in Under 23 games - I KNOW I'll be wrong about someone in future and McLean seems to have slotted in perfectly. [HASHTAG]#onwardsandupwords[/HASHTAG]
PS - Any news on Rhodes??
PPS - Yes DD, I'm sure we did pay a loan fee and a fairly high salary to get Rhodes, but then we got TK on a free. [HASHTAG]#balances[/HASHTAG]
Fair comment, but let's wait and see.My gripe is that if we pay a hefty loan fee and wages that money may have been better spent on a permanent signing.
The very thought of coughing up 2 or £3m to loan Rhodes and pay his salary if he is sitting on our bench or just not very good as shown at Sheffield Wednesday and Middlesbrough is concerning.
If he turns out to be great and scores for fun the only way we could afford to sign him permanently is if we get promoted.
Loans are usually for big teams to give the youth gametime or to offload expensive rubbish.
We managed to loan out Naismith for free and pay some of his wages and pay someone to dump their unwanted player on us pay all his wages plus a large chunk of his initial transfer price.
Seems pretty like a pretty crap deal.
I think they both have something about them, just a weird arrangement to pay a chunk of I'm guessing about £2m plus his wages just for one season.I think JR and TK are here because they are the ones DF wanted for the way we will play.
I'll revisit this once he's played 10 or so games.I think they both have something about them, just a weird arrangement to pay a chunk of I'm guessing about £2m plus his wages just for one season.
Can't see Rhodes fitting into the wage structure either.
Remi would have been under huge pressure and some would have jumped on any mistake - there were those on here already doing so after early pre-season games.
If DF was confident in the young man's abilities, he wouldn't have brought Krul in.I may have missed something but I don't recall anyone on here expressing any more concern than the concern raised by DF in this article.

I would have personally rather have signed Marriott for a reported 3-£5m on a 4 year contract than loan Rhodes for about 2-£3m on loan for 1 season .The news was good for Norwich City after scans confirmed on-loan striker Jordan Rhodes will be fit for the start of the new season.
Rhodes will miss Saturday’s friendly at Charlton, but should be ready to face Birmingham on August 4. [HASHTAG]#gotoutofjailfree[/HASHTAG]
Edit - Now what are you going to complain about DD???![]()
I really don't understand why when posters express concern all of a sudden people think the're on some sort of mission to destroy a player.
I may have missed something but I don't recall anyone on here expressing any more concern than the concern raised by DF in this article.
If we're not going to have different views on things and be prepared to discuss them, then there really is very little point in this forum.
I would have personally rather have signed Marriott for a reported 3-£5m on a 4 year contract than loan Rhodes for about 2-£3m on loan for 1 season .
Lets see who scores the most next season ?
If it's Rhodes them we can hope to pay probably about £5m on top of what we have spent already or get outbid by a rival.
If Marriot his value will double or even quadruple if he's as prolific as I believe he can be.
If we can't call professional sportsmen that are paid to play games for a living hurtful things like "butterfingers" without triggering each other then we need to get a thicker skin.I can understand 'having concerns' or 'harbouring doubts' with a lot at stake, but it was more the name calling like ''butterfingers" and other denigrations based on scant evidence that I was referring to. Concerns are one thing, name calling is quite another.
DF had to make a tough call and he has done so and I'm ok with that. It may also be that Remi is not the type of keeper DF wants, playing the ball out and passing it on rather than kicking or bowling it out. The decision has been made now though and we can all move on.