Obviously a little soon to be drawing conclusions, but to me an early concern would be that we look like we're going to give Farke's original 4-1-4-1 from last season another shot, with the same lack of defensive midfield. The midfield options might be more to Farke's liking, but I'm still not sure it's a tactic you can make work in the championship.
Obviously a little soon to be drawing conclusions, but to me an early concern would be that we look like we're going to give Farke's original 4-1-4-1 from last season another shot, with the same lack of defensive midfield. The midfield options might be more to Farke's liking, but I'm still not sure it's a tactic you can make work in the championship.
Meanwhile it seems unclear whether Oliveira will stay or move on. Apparently he's a week behind the other players and is still catching up.
http://www.pinkun.com/norwich-city/canaries-oliveira-future-farke-response-1-5604836
OK FML - some very reasoned points for discussion.Right.
Last season, this kind of thing was said in pre-season, it didn't work that well. And all the talk was, "give him a window", "one window was never going to be enough to change things, give him the second window"
"It was his first season, give him the summer window"
Agree, a little, in a way. But all this talk about his brutal over the top training, was that by the second season, we will be machines!! The players will be so on it, we can really push on.
Nope. We sold every one of our good players again, and bought in new players. So we are pretty much back at last Summer. Farke working players way too hard who aren't use to it. With worse players.
Before I get attacked, I'm not saying that in an aggressive way, I am calm. I just don't understand last seasons logic. We basically have had to buy a new first team again, so what did the "Farke breaking in" season actually mean?
It's a question for discussion rather than trying to make an argument.

Yea, the fee's wasn't my point. It was the drop in quality of player, and the fact all this "getting players use to his work rate and style" was for nothing. They were barely use to it, and they have gone.OK FML - some very reasoned points for discussion.
Unfortunately, our good players all WANTED to leave and we were amply rewarded re the fees we received for them (I know you disagree re Pritchard, but Huddersfield were the only team interested). My problem is that SW/DF will only see a maximum of approx £10M.
I'm fairly impressed with the majority of the new recruits and I'm hopeful that JM n't be missed won't be missed too much - Josh not really bothered and I hope 'Colin' can make him a better player.
We've made good signings in both McClean and Pukki (jury's out on Rhodes) and I'm hoping that TC stays, rather than be loaned out again. Thompson (if he stays free of injury) and Gofrey have the potential to 'step up to the plate' IMO.
Overall, I'm feeling quite positive!!
OK, so we've lost JM and I don't see Josh as a loss - how many other players have moved on???Yea, the fee's wasn't my point. It was the drop in quality of player.
I know we had to sell, because how much our board have totally p*ssed away all our opportunities. That's not what I was talking about. I was talking about Farkes work, that we were told would show benefits in the second season.
It can't when all the players move on, and we have to do that again. That was my point.
Well, right off the bat. Without Madders, we had nothing to us.OK, so we've lost JM and I don't see Josh as a loss - how many other players have moved on???
Positives - Passlack is an upgrade, as is Pukki and if Pinto leaves, I wouldn't class that as a loss, same for Basil.
TC, Thompson and Godfrey can certainly make an impact given the opportunity.
I hope this isn't us getting into an argument. I can't tell anymore.Well, right off the bat. Without Madders, we had nothing to us.
2nd, Madders was top assists and scorer, Josh was our second. In a season where we never knew how to attack, let alone score. Didn't we also lose our 3rd highest? Or was that just internet bs?
Again though, my point wasn't really about who we bought or sold.
I hope this isn't us getting into an argument. I can't tell anymore.
If you say something and someone disagrees, it seems like it needs to have a fight happen.
Not at all. Last season was one of the worse seasons of football I’ve had to watch. Last season was horrific. Madders was the only positive thing. The football was so,so negative and boring.No fight FML. You seem to feel that we'd be better off if we go into this season with the same players we had last season (and presumably the same style of play). I'm a huge fan of Madders and he did a tremendous job for us last season, but it also meant that most of our play had to go through him. That slowed us down and, IMO, cost us points because the players around him couldn't make the most of his skills.
Murphy had some great moments and scored some valuable goals, but there were also too many games where he was anonymous. Our lack of another viable option meant that he played more than he should have. We also lost Wes to age more than anything else. Gunn and Reed will be missed as well.
In their place we've resigned Leitner and added six other promising players who have the whole of the pre-season to gel into the squad, as well as five promising young players to provide a depth that we lacked last season. As I posted above, the key will lie in the potential improvement in attack, as we have a settled defence, improved by Passlack, and a solid midfield improved by McLean, Thompson and Godfrey. Matthews has a tough act to follow 'for sure', but can that be said for Pukki and Rhodes? That's where our season will lie, IMO.