Off Topic Politics Thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
It's all corporate greed and nothing to do with the vast increase in money supply over the last 10 years, and particularly the last two.

You must log in or register to see images
 
  • Like
Reactions: Osvaldorama
Puck said:
It's all corporate greed and nothing to do with the vast increase in money supply over the last 10 years, and particularly the last two.

You must log in or register to see images
Click to expand...

Exactly.

Every £ that is printed. Every time the government tells you something is “free”.. is actually them stealing from you and your family. It redirects resources away from where money should be spent naturally, to being spent on areas where corrupt bureaucrats decide.

They dilute the money supply and it corrupts the market place so that real price incentives get erased. Then - worse than that - they bail out companies which should have failed, which creates even more problems

Then all of this extra money inflates assets at the expense of wage earners and creates both a huge wealth gap and a declining society.

Taxation = theft
Inflation = slavery
 
ChilcoSaint said:
Looking like the game’s up for Truss. The lettuce may well see her off.
You must log in or register to see media
Click to expand...
Apparently Truss called the meeting so Brady could tell her what the mood of the party is. Surely she can work that out for herself! <doh>
 
tomw24 said:
Apparently Truss called the meeting so Brady could tell her what the mood of the party is. Surely she can work that out for herself! <doh>
Click to expand...
No she didn’t. The No.10 aides in the lobby briefing found out about Brady’s arrival at the same time as the journalists.
 
I may have this wrong but as I understand it an MP who becomes PM is entitled to receive a pension that is equal to 50% of the position’s salary, even if they are only in that position for a few days, but if they are in that position for a specified amount of time the pension entitlement is equal to 100% of the position’s salary.
If that is the case and depending on how much time is needed to attain the full pension, could Truss be hanging on to reach that cut off point?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back