Payne played in the same team as Rodman so with Rodman here it might just swing this transfer our way as Payne will know that crosses will come in and he knows how to hit the back of the net. Maybe just maybe our luck is on the change
Now this is more like it. I was not impressed with the Walsall lad. I would have supported him of course but I felt we could do so much better and this Shrewsbury guy seems to tick my boxes. I will be very happy and more optimistic of a good campaign if this signing happens.
If he wasnt after him alongside Bakayoko but is behind Bakayoko on the shopping list, I be worried why he is behind him on the list as too me he is the better option by far. I feel we had a lucky escape with not signing Bakayoko and if we sign this Shrewsbury striker then he would have his mate Rodman here who would know his game as pointed out already and if he is good on the floor then thats good with his hold up play and getting involved more than just using him for hoofball tactics.He looked good on the ground. Not sure how many of his goals attempts were blocked as those on his video seem to be blasted through lotsalegs. I wonder whether DC was after him alongside Bakayoko as this chap doesn't appear to tick the box of a big lad up front!.
I'm sure you would agree that crosses into the box for a big striker from two quality wing men doesn't constitute hoofball tactics.If he wasnt after him alongside Bakayoko but is behind Bakayoko on the shopping list, I be worried why he is behind him on the list as too me he is the better option by far. I feel we had a lucky escape with not signing Bakayoko and if we sign this Shrewsbury striker then he would have his mate Rodman here who would know his game as pointed out already and if he is good on the floor then thats good with his hold up play and getting involved more than just using him for hoofball tactics.
Of course. I wasnt suggesting thats what you meantI'm sure you would agree that crosses into the box for a big striker from two quality wing men doesn't constitute hoofball tactics.

Fair comment.Of course. I wasnt suggesting thats what you meant
I was just saying I prefer a striker who can hold up the ball so he can protect the ball and is good with his feet as the style we play is that way with our passing game and we have the players to do this. I wouldnt us to sign a striker and play hoofball just because he is big if he aint actually good with the ball at his feet.
I like route 1 too but only at the right time. Some times when our keeper catches from a corner and a quick punt up field when it could be 1 v 1 is effective. But hopelessly and consistently punting up field to 1 striker who has 2 defenders on him all the time is just to easy to combat and more often than not invites the opposition to come at us.Fair comment.
I noticed in the World Cup matches that as the tournament progressed teams played a more direct form of football.
Take the opening game for Germany. IMO they were the best technical passing team on show. Threading the ball through very tight margins with tremendous skill. But it slows the game down and in their case they finished with the ball on the right wing; pretty much everybody else in the opponents box; so a cross came over without a dominant header of the ball; if it fell to feet it and was blasted high wide and handsome. They stuck rigidly to their game plan and came unstuck.
As a young man I used to watch Rovers who were ridiculed for playing the 'long ball'. But it was a successful tactic in the days of man for man marking. The forwards would pull the defence out of position and the ball was played out of defence over the opposition into space for racehorses like Bobby Jones to out run the defenders to collect the ball in clear space.
Mind you, if athletics had been professional then instead of all amateur, I don't think Bobby Jones would have wasted his talent playing football He was seriously quick.
I just prefer a balance between skilled approach and open play. Crowded boxes spoil the game.

I'm not much of an admirer of long punts out from defence. I want see the ball moved quickly on the floor and passed upfield in as direct a way as is possible. Half a dozen passes around and back around the defensive arc in your own half enables your opponents to set themselves up to force the final play into their defensive shield with most of their team behind he ball defending. Attackers then can't find a way through and reshuffle the ball and play it back to their defence to start the process all over again. It's great for the possessions stats, but does it make for entertaining football?I like route 1 too but only at the right time. Some times when our keeper catches from a corner and a quick punt up field when it could be 1 v 1 is effective. But hopelessly and consistently punting up field to 1 striker who has 2 defenders on him all the time is just to easy to combat and more often than not invites the opposition to come at us.
Lukaku for example. Belgium got the pass and move going really well, especially the counter attacks as they got pace too. But Lukaku has the ability to hold up the ball and get others in the game and he has the height for crosses too. I just prefer a number 9 to have the ability to use both his feet and head not just his head
Everything I read on the Walsall lad, he seems to lack the footwork part. Read he also cant really hold up the well either. But the Shrewsbury guy seems to be able to hold the ball well. With our midfielders, a number 9 like Payne is better than the number 9 like Bayayoko.