O/T Sherlock

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Er actually the BBC is showing Doctor Who at prime time on Christmas Day, which is entirely fair enough.

What I don't understand is after what, two years? We're getting three episodes in the space of 10 days. It's like weaning an addict off heroin then giving him three huge hits in quick succession.

Fair enough on Doc Who as I said before (which I will be recording, never watch telly on Christmas Day after about 3pm), but the rest is ****e.

The first two series were the same, all three episodes spread across a couple of weeks.
 
Moriarty is still Sherlock's equal, so they haven't really changed the character whatsoever.

Like has been said, it's a modern version. Why should everything be exactly the same?

Moriarty was played a as a deranged lunatic in Sherlock as said before this was not Moriarty character or nature!
as you keep saying about a modern version, then surley you have to stick to the what the characters are, And there was no equal been shown between the BBC seriers

If your going to rehash things then surley the characters have to remain the same (that can be man or woman) or its not the same and doesnt pay credit to the author or fans!


Dr Who, Nope sorry just carnt do it, Broadwalk Empire, Game of Thrones and Breaking Bad are great watching :emoticon-0148-yes:
 
The new mini-episode:

[video=youtube;JwntNANJCOE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JwntNANJCOE[/video]




Jesus, what the hell happened to Anderson?
 
The new mini-episode:

[video=youtube;JwntNANJCOE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JwntNANJCOE[/video]




Jesus, what the hell happened to Anderson?

<ok>


Not sure why Anderson is frothing at the gash in prospect of Sherlock's return.

Or why he has adopted the Ian Watkins look.

But nevermind, was still interesting.
 
2 hours 15 mins to go

Can't wait, my favourite actor, and a bloody marvellous show!!
 
**** it.

Another thing on from that - it is known that if you put a rubber ball in your armpit and squeeze down it can stop the pulse in your arm. In the final scene with Molly, Sherlock is bouncing a rubber ball.

John felt his pulse, and he didn't get one. Maybe this is why...

Called it.

Even if he possibly wasn't telling the truth.
 
That was special television.




I absolutely loved how the writers led us on a merry chase, everyone believed that it would be so complicated, that Sherlock Holmes would be as sophisticated as ever.
 
My exact words when that happened were, "**** sake, he's going to boast about this".

To be fair when I saw it I was thinking 'did I really actually get it partly correct?'. I was bloody shell-shocked.

I honestly thought the squash ball thing was just me over complicating from trying to work it out for over 20 months...



Back to the episode - it was a brilliant one. Liked the V for Vendetta plot, and also surprisingly liked John's fiance. I thought she'd be really annoying but she's actually alright.

Oh, and the Derren Brown theory in the intro was great - you know they did that just to cause twitter to go into meltdown...

And finally, the little cameo by Sherlock's parents - who were played by Cumberbatch's actual mum and dad.