O/T: and so it goes on, can we please stop bashing religion?

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Getting away from the extremism of any religion, which the vast majority of its followers hate as much as any athiest, it's hard to claim that Christianity in the form of the Catholic Church (and hence far more moderate) haven't ****ed up society to an extent. A few examples are how they've held back gay marriage for absolutely ages, and (less seriously) are still allowed to **** pupils over in science gcse's by hiding that evolution is a theory. However, I do think that although aspects of religion can't avoid being bashed, this is primarily the governments fault for giving religion so much special treatment. Basically, the Catholic Church and extremism...yeah, bash those, but less fundamentalist views are should probably get an easier ride, they just get tarred with the same brush.
 
Islamic community can very easily illustrate that they are not at fault
1. Can they?

2. So your idea of democracy is to defend something but, in the same post, deny other people the right to give their opinion.

3. What will you do if I defy your instructions, have me stoned?

4. How can anyone defend the kidnapping of 300 schoolgirls to be used as sex slaves by an Islamic group?

5. Are people not allowed to be intolerant of that kind of thing?

6. And what current example would you select, in the name of Christianity, that compares ......... seeing as it's so easy to do.

1. Yes. And they do via selecting information that only serves to corroborate their view. To an extent we all do this, in it's extreme form it can be and is very ugly. My point is that that the insecure and fanatical believers, not necessarily religionists, take this to unacceptable levels based on fear/intollerance/hate.

2. I have expressed an opinion and so have you.

3. I don't think that comment merits a response.

4. I would be alarmed if anyone did and '5.' equally alarmed if anyone wasn't.

6. Has been amply illustrated by other posters.
 
Shameless, you're already an atheist. You already don't believe in all of the other ridiculous man made gods - Thor, Mars, Ra, Ganeshan, Zeus et al. You just need to grow up a little more, let go of your infantile wish-fulfilment fairy tale, investigate the real wonders of the Universe, and let go more of one more invented 'god'.

You're already morally superior to your bronze-age invented myth, you just need to see through the brain-washing you've been subjected and leave these childish lies behind. The human race will never achieve it's true potential while the cancerous meme of religion continues to infect the human mind.

You and your sort are on the wrong side of history, and you know it.

I'm geuinely bamboozled by this post <ok>
 
It used to be evangelical types knocking on my door that got on my tits. Now bloody atheists seem to feel they have a right to spout off. Religion or lack thereof is entirely personal and I am not particularly bothered by other people's views. It's a topic that doesn't half kick it off though...
 
1. Yes. And they do via selecting information that only serves to corroborate their view. To an extent we all do this, in it's extreme form it can be and is very ugly. My point is that that the insecure and fanatical believers, not necessarily religionists, take this to unacceptable levels based on fear/intollerance/hate.

2. I have expressed an opinion and so have you.

3. I don't think that comment merits a response.

4. I would be alarmed if anyone did and '5.' equally alarmed if anyone wasn't.

6. Has been amply illustrated by other posters.

You're telling people to stop 'bashing religion' which is simply your definition.

If I choose to criticise a religious doctrine that's my choice in a democracy ....... I may even be correct in doing so.

I'm also perfectly within my rights to disagree with any religious doctrine I find intolerable.

I find the whipping and execution of someone, purely on religious grounds, to be intolerable.

Do you find it acceptable .......... yes or no?
 
It used to be evangelical types knocking on my door that got on my tits. Now bloody atheists seem to feel they have a right to spout off. Religion or lack thereof is entirely personal and I am not particularly bothered by other people's views. It's a topic that doesn't half kick it off though...

Spot on mate. I've seen many good mates argue with each other endlessly over it, and it gets pretty heated at times. For me, it's a topic that just goes round and round in circles. Neither side is ever going to convince the other, so I think the best thing is just to agree to disagree, and get on with each other as civilised human beings.

Personally I'd much rather just talk about footy and birds like. <ok>
 
If in doubt, create your own religion, and say '**** you' to anyone who don't like it, or just torture and kill at will.

Old Henry did this well.



ps, i'd ****ing love a good pork pie.
 
1. You're telling people to stop 'bashing religion' which is simply your definition.

2. If I choose to criticise a religious doctrine that's my choice in a democracy ....... I may even be correct in doing so.

3. I'm also perfectly within my rights to disagree with any religious doctrine I find intolerable.

4. I find the whipping and execution of someone, purely on religious grounds, to be intolerable.

5. Do you find it acceptable .......... yes or no?

1. It states, 'can we please ...', that's a far cry from the dogma you attempt to throw back at me.

2. In principle, I agree. I do not agree that I have done anything to deny you that basic human right <ok>

3. refer to '2'

4. Which is rarely practised, even in places where it is instituted, most Islamic states do not practise these forms of tyranny. Besides, I believe such things deny our humanity for both giver and receiver.

5. Please refer to the original post, I have not claimed that some aspects of Sharia Law should be justified or tolerated.
 
It used to be evangelical types knocking on my door that got on my tits. Now bloody atheists seem to feel they have a right to spout off. Religion or lack thereof is entirely personal and I am not particularly bothered by other people's views. It's a topic that doesn't half kick it off though...

Many Atheists are angry and I can fully understand why. I would also like to sympathise with the feeling that you feel your beliefs are under attack and you -'the self' feel invaded.

If we can remove anger (bitterness/frustration) and bigotry from our discussion, there is much to be gained by all. I feel that what religionists need to recognise is that there are a growing number of people who are dissatisfied by religious dogmas. All this, despite the inumerable scholars who pour over ancient scripts in their attempts to clarify (their) truth and provide society with answers that will make things better for all.
 
1. It states, 'can we please ...', that's a far cry from the dogma you attempt to throw back at me.

2. In principle, I agree. I do not agree that I have done anything to deny you that basic human right <ok>

3. refer to '2'

4. Which is rarely practised, even in places where it is instituted, most Islamic states do not practise these forms of tyranny. Besides, I believe such things deny our humanity for both giver and receiver.

5. Please refer to the original post, I have not claimed that some aspects of Sharia Law should be justified or tolerated.

World leaders were outraged that this woman was due to be beaten & executed purely on the grounds of religion.
David Cameron said it was barbaric, I agree.

If you think that means everyone is 'bashing religion' them tough luck I'm afraid.

I'll always speak out against such disgusting religious practices so the answer to your thread question is ........... no.