And if your'e really lucky, you get to take its mate home..![]()
I have once or twice.
And if your'e really lucky, you get to take its mate home..![]()
1. Can they?Islamic community can very easily illustrate that they are not at fault
2. So your idea of democracy is to defend something but, in the same post, deny other people the right to give their opinion.
3. What will you do if I defy your instructions, have me stoned?
4. How can anyone defend the kidnapping of 300 schoolgirls to be used as sex slaves by an Islamic group?
5. Are people not allowed to be intolerant of that kind of thing?
6. And what current example would you select, in the name of Christianity, that compares ......... seeing as it's so easy to do.
Shameless, you're already an atheist. You already don't believe in all of the other ridiculous man made gods - Thor, Mars, Ra, Ganeshan, Zeus et al. You just need to grow up a little more, let go of your infantile wish-fulfilment fairy tale, investigate the real wonders of the Universe, and let go more of one more invented 'god'.
You're already morally superior to your bronze-age invented myth, you just need to see through the brain-washing you've been subjected and leave these childish lies behind. The human race will never achieve it's true potential while the cancerous meme of religion continues to infect the human mind.
You and your sort are on the wrong side of history, and you know it.

1. Yes. And they do via selecting information that only serves to corroborate their view. To an extent we all do this, in it's extreme form it can be and is very ugly. My point is that that the insecure and fanatical believers, not necessarily religionists, take this to unacceptable levels based on fear/intollerance/hate.
2. I have expressed an opinion and so have you.
3. I don't think that comment merits a response.
4. I would be alarmed if anyone did and '5.' equally alarmed if anyone wasn't.
6. Has been amply illustrated by other posters.
Moron

You not got anything better? I'm used to being called worse then that![]()
No, that pretty much sums it up..... "A person of mild mental ******ation having a mental age of 7 to 12...."

It used to be evangelical types knocking on my door that got on my tits. Now bloody atheists seem to feel they have a right to spout off. Religion or lack thereof is entirely personal and I am not particularly bothered by other people's views. It's a topic that doesn't half kick it off though...

1. You're telling people to stop 'bashing religion' which is simply your definition.
2. If I choose to criticise a religious doctrine that's my choice in a democracy ....... I may even be correct in doing so.
3. I'm also perfectly within my rights to disagree with any religious doctrine I find intolerable.
4. I find the whipping and execution of someone, purely on religious grounds, to be intolerable.
5. Do you find it acceptable .......... yes or no?

You not got anything better? I'm used to being called worse then that![]()
It used to be evangelical types knocking on my door that got on my tits. Now bloody atheists seem to feel they have a right to spout off. Religion or lack thereof is entirely personal and I am not particularly bothered by other people's views. It's a topic that doesn't half kick it off though...
1. It states, 'can we please ...', that's a far cry from the dogma you attempt to throw back at me.
2. In principle, I agree. I do not agree that I have done anything to deny you that basic human right
3. refer to '2'
4. Which is rarely practised, even in places where it is instituted, most Islamic states do not practise these forms of tyranny. Besides, I believe such things deny our humanity for both giver and receiver.
5. Please refer to the original post, I have not claimed that some aspects of Sharia Law should be justified or tolerated.