Next manager

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Suggestions are being made that there's a full board meeting to discuss the choice of manager.

That really doesn't sound feasible or necessary to me.

Is that what happens elsewhere?
 
Suggestions are being made that there's a full board meeting to discuss the choice of manager.

That really doesn't sound feasible or necessary to me.

Is that what happens elsewhere?

Maybe everyone has a favourite so they draw lots. That must have happened previously, surely?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nads
Suggestions are being made that there's a full board meeting to discuss the choice of manager.

That really doesn't sound feasible or necessary to me.

Is that what happens elsewhere?
Probably looking at the Forums and seeing the anti Parkinson posts , we better get the chuckle brothers in aka Coton and Hill because the natives are restless what should we do ? . First thing the new Manager should do is question their abilities and suggest they could do better without them . The investment saga will hopefully be resolved soon all we can do is watch this space .
 
I really hope the SAFC board never look at the forums tbh.

If, as is claimed, there'll be 20 people at a meeting to choose the manager, who the hell are they all?

Is Satori likely to attend a board meeting when he probably knows none of the candidates.

It's nonsense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nads
I really hope the SAFC board never look at the forums tbh.

If, as is claimed, there'll be 20 people at a meeting to choose the manager, who the hell are they all?

Is Satori likely to attend a board meeting when he probably knows none of the candidates.

It's nonsense.
If it's 20 people involved, surely something has happened regarding the takeover, and it's to let people know? I'm only guessing, but that's all i can think of. (Perhaps i'm saying that to convince myself it's happening)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Smug in Boots
I really hope the SAFC board never look at the forums tbh.

If, as is claimed, there'll be 20 people at a meeting to choose the manager, who the hell are they all?

Is Satori likely to attend a board meeting when he probably knows none of the candidates.

It's nonsense.

Absolutely. And look at the way people respond.

‘Who’s the 20?’, ‘must be legal teams as well’.

NOOOOO!

There’s no 20 people, no board meeting, it’s ****ing bullshit.

Read it, think about it, process it, think ‘actually that doesn’t sound right’, ignore it.

We do not have 20 board members, even with legal we’d see 5-8 people in a meeting.

It’s bullshit. Stop giving lying imbeciles on the internet a ****ing voice.
 
Pearson, Parkinson? If it is Pearson, he will just say that's what he meant
I really hope the SAFC board never look at the forums tbh.

If, as is claimed, there'll be 20 people at a meeting to choose the manager, who the hell are they all?

Is Satori likely to attend a board meeting when he probably knows none of the candidates.

It's nonsense.
I hope they look at the Parkinson thread before it’s too late.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nads
Absolutely. And look at the way people respond.

‘Who’s the 20?’, ‘must be legal teams as well’.

NOOOOO!

There’s no 20 people, no board meeting, it’s ****ing bullshit.

Read it, think about it, process it, think ‘actually that doesn’t sound right’, ignore it.

We do not have 20 board members, even with legal we’d see 5-8 people in a meeting.

It’s bullshit. Stop giving lying imbeciles on the internet a ****ing voice.
What if FPP and their advisers join in?
 
Absolutely. And look at the way people respond.

‘Who’s the 20?’, ‘must be legal teams as well’.

NOOOOO!

There’s no 20 people, no board meeting, it’s ****ing bullshit.

Read it, think about it, process it, think ‘actually that doesn’t sound right’, ignore it.

We do not have 20 board members, even with legal we’d see 5-8 people in a meeting.

It’s bullshit. Stop giving lying imbeciles on the internet a ****ing voice.

Couldn’t agree more. If one thing epitomised RTG it was someone making a claim then loads of people reacting as if it was a fact. Calm down people
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nads
Absolutely. And look at the way people respond.

‘Who’s the 20?’, ‘must be legal teams as well’.

NOOOOO!

There’s no 20 people, no board meeting, it’s ****ing bullshit.

Read it, think about it, process it, think ‘actually that doesn’t sound right’, ignore it.

We do not have 20 board members, even with legal we’d see 5-8 people in a meeting.

It’s bullshit. Stop giving lying imbeciles on the internet a ****ing voice.
The lad who has posted it has been spot on with info in the past iirc.
Doesn't necessarily mean there is 20 board members but maybe a meeting for 20 people in the boardroom.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Smug in Boots