New mod thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
I was going to vote Kempton Klutz but he seems to have disappeared :confused:

He was a demented fool J_D, he often drank wine while posting on here, he thought Matty Fryatt was a good striker and regulararly checked out babe of the day. He was a heathen and just had to go !
 
He was a demented fool J_D, he often drank wine while posting on here, he thought Matty Fryatt was a good striker and regulararly checked out babe of the day. He was a heathen and just had to go !

... as long as he didn't think that Matty Fryatt WAS babe of the day he'll do for me ...
 
it doesnt bother me one bit whos mod, but are people really voting erik? <laugh> no offence....
but thats like inviting ian huntley to interview for caretaker at your local school..
the one real job a moderator has is making sure banter/arguments and content doesnt go too far and get too offensive, which is the one moral compass he seems to lack..
once again no offence erik, but come on! <laugh>
 
it doesnt bother me one bit whos mod, but are people really voting erik? <laugh> no offence....
but thats like inviting ian huntley to interview for caretaker at your local school..
the one real job a moderator has is making sure banter/arguments and content doesnt go too far and get too offensive, which is the one moral compass he seems to lack..
once again no offence erik, but come on! <laugh>

Is this your manifesto for the role? <laugh>
 
it doesnt bother me one bit whos mod, but are people really voting erik? <laugh> no offence....
but thats like inviting ian huntley to interview for caretaker at your local school..
the one real job a moderator has is making sure banter/arguments and content doesnt go too far and get too offensive, which is the one moral compass he seems to lack..
once again no offence erik, but come on! <laugh>

Actually, I'd say my knowledge of the site, such as the other teams' forums, General Chat, and the people most likely to attempt to 'wum' our board is a good reason to vote me in.

As long as there's nothing child-related in anyone's pornographic posts and they put them in 'NSFW' tags, why not? If there were complaints then I'd address the problem :biggrin:

I did say I'd follow the Lambretta blueprint for moderating. I certainly wouldn't be at the other extreme and over-zealous, like that **** from the Southampton board, 'channonfodder', who refers to himself as a 'lad' and yet whose actions strongly suggest a man who only has sex if it's done in the missionary position, on his birthday, through a hole in a white sheet with the lights turned-off.
 
Actually, I'd say my knowledge of the site, such as the other teams' forums, General Chat, and the people most likely to attempt to 'wum' our board is a good reason to vote me in.

As long as there's nothing child-related in anyone's pornographic posts and they put them in 'NSFW' tags, why not? If there were complaints then I'd address the problem :biggrin:

I did say I'd follow the Lambretta blueprint for moderating. I certainly wouldn't be at the other extreme and over-zealous, like that **** from the Southampton board, 'channonfodder', who refers to himself as a 'lad' and yet whose actions strongly suggest a man who only has sex if it's done in the missionary position, on his birthday, through a hole in a white sheet with the lights turned-off.

. errrrrrrrr do other people do it differently then? .. mine's a pretty big hole in the sheet I'll have you know!
 
For the thankless task of modding it has to be someone who puts their name forward. The style of modding is dictated by the site owners and has worked well and there is no need for change. I think ISTPLT is probably the best pick of the volunteers even if he does come across as a fxxkwit sometimes.

If Mr Tickler puts his name forward and it goes to a poll, then he gets my vote. A lack of intellect should not preclude anyone and Mr Tickler has a pretty thick skin.

Come on Mr Tickler, what about it?
 
. errrrrrrrr do other people do it differently then? .. mine's a pretty big hole in the back of the sheet I'll have you know!

Aye up Flossy, what about a temporary exchange deal? I'll PM you my log in details and you PM me yours and we'll look after each others boards for a bit?
 
Actually, I'd say my knowledge of the site, such as the other teams' forums, General Chat, and the people most likely to attempt to 'wum' our board is a good reason to vote me in.

And how many teams forums have you been banned from? ;)
 
As long as there's nothing child-related in anyone's pornographic posts and they put them in 'NSFW' tags, why not? If there were complaints then I'd address the problem :biggrin:

The problem would be that Mick doesn't like it being posted on the open forums and it's his site.

(I'm in the process of getting all the nominations etc sorted now)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.