New Head Coach

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Rosenior would again be fine. I have been guilty of it myself but we need to stop looking at league position with other clubs with completely different squads. Mowbray was finishing mid table and worse with Blackburn. Maresca was ****e at Parma. Martin never finished in the top half with MK Dons or Swansea.

Also silly to say Rosenior is free without mentioning that Jansen is also free. Can't use it as a slight against one and not mention it with the other. Jansen isn't the type to demand a coaching team either, he's very much a head coach not a manager.
Apologies, Martin finished 10th with Swansea. Must be ****.
 
On the lack of ambition thing, it’s a pretty lazy argument as well. An all out pursuit of Will Still was if anything TOO ambitious.

Appointing somebody else when he turns us down doesn’t make us unambitious.
It’s not a lazy argument at all. We’ve had since February to scope this out. They could have understood Still’s demands early doors and squashed it. They didn’t do that.
 
I think that’s exactly what it is mate, to be honest. Don’t get still, hire someone who we know will come on our terms? Look, I’m not trying to say this is a forgone conclusion. But if Rosenior was to get the job I wouldn’t be impressed in the slightest. That’s all I’m saying.

Ok but in that definition anyone we hire is an afterthought. Pascal Jansen is also an afterthought.
 
It’s not a lazy argument at all. We’ve had since February to scope this out. They could have understood Still’s demands early doors and squashed it. They didn’t do that.

that has nowt to do with ambition though. It has lots to do with competency which we lack. But not ambition.
 
Ok but in that definition anyone we hire is an afterthought. Pascal Jansen is also an afterthought.
Maybe so mate. But at least he has pedigree. This appointment is more than just managerial. It’s about ambition. They appointed Beale because they thought they were smarter than everyone else. Whether people like it or not, the optics of this appointment matter.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dorset
Maybe so mate. But at least he has pedigree. This appointment is more than just managerial. It’s about ambition. They appointed Beale because they thought they were smarter than everyone else. Whether people like it or not, the optics of this appointment matter.

completely agree the optics matter. That’s why I’d rather Jansen.

There’s nothing to say that Jansen has any different demands to Rosenior so I don’t necessarily think it’s obvious that it will come down to who accepts Dodds etc. for what it’s worth I think they both will.
 
completely agree the optics matter. That’s why I’d rather Jansen.

There’s nothing to say that Jansen has any different demands to Rosenior so I don’t necessarily think it’s obvious that it will come down to who accepts Dodds etc. for what it’s worth I think they both will.
This Dodds thing is doing my nut in. He was brought in to feed back to speakman. He’s not there to dictate who we can and can’t bring in. He should never be a stumbling block.
 
Maybe so mate. But at least he has pedigree. This appointment is more than just managerial. It’s about ambition. They appointed Beale because they thought they were smarter than everyone else. Whether people like it or not, the optics of this appointment matter.
Yeah they do but I honestly don't think the optics of Rosenior is that bad, at least it shouldn't be. Heavy possession football which is the current successful method in this league. Championship experience which is something people cry out for. Speaks tremendously well and I don't mean a bullshitter like a Beale but he's an actual good person. Has been spoken about as the reason for getting players like Carvalho there on loan and he was very good for him in particular, first few paragraphs of this;

https://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/spo...ews/fabio-carvalho-makes-big-hull-9291487.amp

However i've made my views on the timing of this whole thing very clear and it's not good, if this appointment was weeks ago i'd be praising it but i'm kind of just breathing a sigh of relief that it's coming to a close.
 
Anyway. 2 hours ago we were mortified at the prospect of Challinor or Robinson. I think it’s fair to say Rosenior is less of a disaster than them.

If it’s him, I hope we don’t get a Beale-like response. The club will clearly deserve questioning for how long it all took, but I hope it doesn’t go beyond that.

Personally hope it’s still Jansen.
 
Perception is a very funny thing. Rosenior was a hell of a lot more highly rated by football fans before he was sacked by Hull.

After his sacking, people have looked for reasons and problems with his coaching.

If he was still at Hull and we were linked, I think a lot more people would consider him a good appointment.
 
Perception is a very funny thing. Rosenior was a hell of a lot more highly rated by football fans before he was sacked by Hull.

After his sacking, people have looked for reasons and problems with his coaching.

If he was still at Hull and we were linked, I think a lot more people would consider him a good appointment.
The sacking of Rosenior has striking similarities to us sacking Mowbray. Outsiders looking at it in disbelief but the owners/directors at the club saying it was the right decision.
 
One thing I will say about Rosenior - I watched Hull a few times last season and they played some really tidy stuff.

I thought they were awful at the SOL. Scrappy goal that won it for them. I think he under achieved last season. He had the likes of Philogene, Carvalho, Twine and Delap to call on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sheepman
The sacking of Rosenior has striking similarities to us sacking Mowbray. Outsiders looking at it in disbelief but the owners/directors at the club saying it was the right decision.

If you read what the owner had to say though, he doesn't mention "failure to not finish top 6" at all. That's the narrative that has been made to fit the situation. He talks about the style of play he's dreaming of not matching up with Rosenior's.

It's a bit reminiscent of the Gary O'Neil situation at Bournemouth to be honest.