moderation question
- Thread starter originallambrettaman
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
Pretty sure I got the second or third most votes out of eight people
Fancy a gobble?
Pretty sure I got the second or third most votes out of eight people
Fancy a gobble?
I was 1 vote off tying it.
You were one of the also-rans.
And nah I'm alright ta mate.
So you were the first loser?
Erik, you got less votes than mboyo
Fuck off
All I'm saying is that if people stopped voting for their pals and realised that this **** is the best man for the job, they'd be happier in the long run. This be facts.
Pals? Voting? Must've missed this. I thought it was given to the first person who out their name forward.
Still wouldn't have voted for Erik though.
Still wouldn't have voted for Erik though.
**** me! this thread still going? If you were all "normal" at this time on a Friday night you really should be discussing Cheese on toast.
****ing Deviants.
****ing Deviants.
I nearly wet my pants with glee when I saw that on the telly guide. But then I saw starship troopers.
Some great tits in starship troopers. Still wished I watched the running man.
I'm offended by Phil browns inclusion on this piece of ****. I request this thread is now closed, as its clearly going nowhere.
Vote was in late August last year. PLT beat Party Hull narrowly in a run-off Poll. Votes before the run-off Poll were as below:
PLT 29
Party Hull 25
None of the listed candidates 16
Erik 12
Bum Chinned Crab 5
Stanistheman 4
DJ 4
JD 2
Look at No 1 post and tell me how it makes sense if you haven't read the other thread, which I may add I didn't. This looks like a fight between Chien and OLM.
Try to keep up.
i dont get any of this thread , to me its an argument between Chien and himself 
i've obviously missed something !!!
anyway back on the only part of the thread i understand ,
I think i voted Party mainly down to his strange posts and that i assumed he would bring Pringles , Girls and unicorns to the forum
i've obviously missed something !!!
anyway back on the only part of the thread i understand ,
I think i voted Party mainly down to his strange posts and that i assumed he would bring Pringles , Girls and unicorns to the forum
last time i was on that thread it was quite an interesting and well thought out debate , i was borderline forgive n let him get on with life in football - till someone used the analogy of their kid asking why the fans were booing him ,
II
Just caught this and on a serious note your point is a good one. If he were to be seriously considered as a recruit then I would like to have more detail of his involvement, as it would further shape my support, or not; it's a complex and emotive topic, but I think the Belgians have it right by not putting playing football on such a lofty moral pedestal that gets involved in the on going punishment of juvenile delinquency. It's a bit like the De Canio fascist argument, is there contrition and is that enough to appease the crowds - my instincts would tell me, that for most, goals will sweeten the pill; I'm not saying that's right though (as I start dodging the flak!)
Just caught this and on a serious note your point is a good one. If he were to be seriously considered as a recruit then I would like to have more detail of his involvement, as it would further shape my support, or not; it's a complex and emotive topic, but I think the Belgians have it right by not putting playing football on such a lofty moral pedestal that gets involved in the on going punishment of juvenile delinquency. It's a bit like the De Canio fascist argument, is there contrition and is that enough to appease the crowds - my instincts would tell me, that for most, goals will sweeten the pill; I'm not saying that's right though (as I start dodging the flak!)