I can’t believe it’s moored at the dock. What’s the bloody point of that ? They might as well be on land. And apparently they’re free to wander into town when they fancy. What a complete joke and waste of our money.
They’re being seen as doing the right thing - I wouldn’t be happy living too close to there that’s for sure - fill it up and sail it back to Calais and offload !I can’t believe it’s moored at the dock. What’s the bloody point of that ? They might as well be on land. And apparently they’re free to wander into town when they fancy. What a complete joke and waste of our money.
Be reasonable, we can’t do that. It needs to stay in UK waters.They’re being seen as doing the right thing - I wouldn’t be happy living too close to there that’s for sure - fill it up and sail it back to Calais and offload !
You haven’t mentioned the most important group - ordinary working class people, like you and I ?If this was an attempt by the Government to look strong on this matter, it's a miserable failure.
They had implied that this would be secure accomodation. That it would in effect be a floating detention centre. A prison barge.
Of course they'll deny ever suggesting that, but they plainly did.
Rishi has managed to please no-one.
Not the human rights lobby on the left, their own MPs or those on the far right.
Like the cost of living crisis - he talks like he gets it, but falls flat on his face when it's time to act.
You haven’t mentioned the most important group - ordinary working class people, like you and I ?
Or are we now grouped with the ‘far right’.
Well said sirI wasn't aware that Rishi has ever tried to please ordinary working class people. I doubt he has even noticed we exist.

Offload half wayThey’re being seen as doing the right thing - I wouldn’t be happy living too close to there that’s for sure - fill it up and sail it back to Calais and offload !

Any child in need should receive equal priority from a local council, if that child is within the boundary of the council's responsibility.
It's not for the council to prioritise care on the basis of where the child came from, or any other filter except the degree of need in each case.
If a local council has a problem with the number of children it is obliged to look after, it should take that up with the Government.
Not take it out on the children concerned.
Are you saying a judge should look the other way when the government break the law?
I served on a jury which tried a man for manslaughter under the law of joint enterprise. For a day and a half we looked for a way of finding him not guilty, since he wasn't guilty if you apply natural justice. However, it was a court of law, and sadly we applied the law and turned in a guilty verdict. It's a cruel law, but without it no-one would have been convicted of the murder of Stephen Lawrence. And a judge has absolutely no choice but to apply the law as it stands.The government are ultimately to blame. I’m not sure where they have broken the law, but if they have then fine. The law is obviously wrong in that case, because KCC simply don’t have anywhere to house the number of illegal immigrant children that it is being asked to house, primarily because they arrive in Kent and have to remain there for a considerable time afterwards.
There are already children in this county and country who need appropriate care who WILL NOT RECEIVE THAT CARE if illegal immigrant children are allowed to ‘jump the queue’ because they are given priority due to force of numbers and because they have a louder voice in the form of migrant charities and judges.
Apportioning blame for all of this could no doubt lead to differences of opinion, but at the end of the day it is down to us, the British public, because we vote for (or don’t vote for) the people who make these decisions.
As I’ve said over and over again, if we want to change things then we have to change who we elect as our leaders.
Mass immigration is now starting to bite, in the form of over population (in certain areas), cuts to local services to pay for it, and social incohesion as local people start to feel the effects and this will all ultimately lead to the breakdown of the British and Western way of life. Some may think this isn’t a bad thing, but for anyone who doesn’t know what it’s like to live in a lawless cesspit, it is going to come as a very nasty shock.
Anything which doesn’t act to prevent this happening is part of the problem, so I include the comments and actions of the judge in this case, although I accept that he is probably just interpreting the law by the book.
Our system is broken.
It’s a difficult one without knowing the details of KCC’s decision and waiting lists for children who were waiting for care before these arrivals.I served on a jury which tried a man for manslaughter under the law of joint enterprise. For a day and a half we looked for a way of finding him not guilty, since he wasn't guilty if you apply natural justice. However, it was a court of law, and sadly we applied the law and turned in a guilty verdict. It's a cruel law, but without it no-one would have been convicted of the murder of Stephen Lawrence. And a judge has absolutely no choice but to apply the law as it stands.
I don’t think there’s any plan which can be implemented. Everything just gets challenged by someone or other and thrown out. And all the time we are paying for it in cuts to services. Pot holes everywhere, not enough Doctors, not enough nurses, not enough Police, not enough armed services, not enough social care for our elderly, but of course more tax.I hear the Government's tent plan was a last minute alternative.
Some bright spark at the Home Office originally struck on the idea of housing asylum seekers in sheds in the back gardens of private rented houses.
But for some reason that plan couldn't be implemented![]()
Fair points about austerity under the Tories. But that’s a separate argument to the illegal immigration issue.No. Tory austerity was the point hospital waiting times started going up, and net's been a constant trend of this terrible government. Remember the 40 hospitals Boris promised. None built so far. I believe thay have started a small one somewhere, which has been slammed as too small for purpose by a watch dog. The Tories are utterly enslaved to the fossil fuel lobby, hence their desperation to fight against on shore wind farms, but back franking,veven though geologists say the UK is unsuitable for this.
So they pile on with 'just stop the boats' as if illegal cruelty to migrating children will build hospitals, or pay doctors enough to stay in the profession.
I do have the same worries, but my fear is of over-population, uncontrolled immigration and the breakdown of law and order in this country as a result. I think that will come long before catastrophic climate change.Having kids is bad enough but having grandkids is a game changer - I truly am worried about their future and what kind of world they will inherit from us - we’re like a cancer to the planet and environment![]()