No, I believe we should be playing better than we have done for weeks and it's Phelan's fault.
ALL Phelans fault? You're certainly living some dream, if you think everything's down to Phelan.
They were completely stifled due to the way that Phelan had set them up. As someone else said the players would be better off managing themselves, there's no way that they would set up so defensively against a relegation rival. It's total lunacy to have Robbo and Elmo's ways blocked by a five man midfield, little ****ing wonder that we were hemmed in our own half!The players on the pitch should have been good enough to compete with Boro. Dawson and Davies are as good a back pair as Chambers/Gibson, even though I do like Gibson, Mason and Livermore as well as Snodgrass should be as good as anything they had on the pitch. Negrado has hardly pulled up any trees for them, and Dio to his defence had **** all service.
I am not saying there were as good on the night obviously they weren't, but if they played anything like we know they can they should have been more than good enough.
I think you must have misread that post, he's just said it's not all Phelan's fault.
So you believe we should be mid-table and its all Phelan's fault?
I think YOU must have misread that post, he's just said it's Phelans fault ....... ''No, I believe we should be playing better than we have done for weeks and it's Phelan's fault''.
PS I have spare spectacles cleaner if you need it.
I get your point there but I think Phelan would say it was working, and the only thing that made it not work was absolutely shocking marking at a set piece. For some reason that's been an issue all season and it's hard to put your finger on why.
was at the game last night and I thought Henriksen was our best attacking threat. Genuinely surprised to see him get so much stick.
Really?! Seriously?
They've got Negredo up front. We've got Diomande who couldn't make our bench in the Championship most of the time. They've got creative players in Ramirez and co in their midfield and attack. We've got a load of defensive centre mids, no creativity and only one winger. We go 1-0 down and all we can bring on is Bowen, Huddlestone and Meyler.
I think people just look at Boro and us as both being bottom end, recently promoted sides and think therefore we must be on a similar level to them. We're a million miles behind them. They finished above us in the summer and then signed about 10 quality players. We struggled at the end of last season, lost half our squad to other clubs or to injury, lost our manager and entire coaching staff, signed a handful of players in the last two days of the window who seem to have been picked out of a hat by Ehab, got even more injuries since then and now are making up the numbers by chucking kids into the first team.
And people think we should be able to compete because it's only Boro. Obviously if we played a trendier formation and Jak was in goal we'd be mid-table.
I'm bookmarking this ****.Well that was easy
A rival relegation side playing like a petrified championship side
You should be embarrased![]()
Who supplied the pass for Diomande's 1 on 1 run at the goalkeeper?I saw some poorly executed attacking build-up play, but no defender would have felt threatened, because they weren't.
Snodgrass and Diomande both played last night! How did it work out?!
Who supplied the pass for Diomande's 1 on 1 run at the goalkeeper?
Still, let's not let facts shroud the witch burning.
Well that was easy
A rival relegation side playing like a petrified championship side
You should be embarrased![]()
The game at Boro needed a positive approach but Phelan chose instead to be cautious, to go for a draw and maybe nick a goal for the win. Fortune favours the brave and I'm afraid Phelan has shown himself to be a fat, bald coward. He makes Bruce look like Bill ****ing Shankly. Before kick-off I bought tickets for Spurs. My god, they will demolish us unless we stop being so passive.