Membership scheme vote - Concessions to return...

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
PLT said:
If they want option A so badly they could just go ahead and do it. No need to validate it with a vote.

At this point I think it's almost impossible to second guess their intentions. I think the reality is the club themselves don't know what they want to do and are just lurching from one thing to another. I think stuff like this vote will be the result of certain staff members at the club pushing for one thing, Ehab pushing back against it and the end result being some sort of compromise where Ehab is satisfied that he has won.
Click to expand...
But they couldn't then claim they consulted with supporters. I think they've divided the concessionary voters so many ways, option A will win comfortably ( IF they have the 40 % turn out). Put it this way, if B was winning, they wouldn't be ringing round to muster those extra votes than get to 40%
 
  • Like
Reactions: look_back_in_amber
askewshair said:
But they couldn't then claim they consulted with supporters. I think they've divided the concessionary voters so many ways, option A will win comfortably ( IF they have the 40 % turn out). Put it this way, if B was winning, they wouldn't be ringing round to muster those extra votes than get to 40%
Click to expand...

They were already claiming to have consulted with supporters a year ago. There's really no reason they had to hold this poll. I think it's just a desperate attempt to win back some fans now that we matter to them financially, but it's infected with the usual combination of Ehab's incompetence and stubbornness. In short, I really don't think they particularly want us to vote A. They are both Ehab options which he has allowed us to be offered, so he'll see either as a victory for him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dills double deckers, dennisboothstash, cheshireles and 3 others
PLT said:
They were already claiming to have consulted with supporters a year ago. There's really no reason they had to hold this poll. I think it's just a desperate attempt to win back some fans now that we matter to them financially, but it's infected with the usual combination of Ehab's incompetence and stubbornness. In short, I really don't think they particularly want us to vote A. They are both Ehab options which he has allowed us to be offered, so he'll see either as a victory for him.
Click to expand...
Everything they do is for a reason. Usually spiteful but always divisive.

Less than 40% and they can claim yet again they have tried to consult with supporters (and get the football supporters body (?) off their back.
Option A wins, their ridiculed and hated no concessions has been vindicated by supporters and keep same body off their back.
Option B mustn't happen and they'll do everything to make sure it doesn't, so load it. If it did then theres the consolation we have already voted to move from north stand. So they can get rid of that loathsome section. Many will go due to cost/ principle of been move. They'll ensure the rest are divided around the ground.

And all they actually did was try to consult with fans.
 
askewshair said:
Everything they do is for a reason. Usually spiteful but always divisive.

Less than 40% and they can claim yet again they have tried to consult with supporters (and get the football supporters body (?) off their back.
Option A wins, their ridiculed and hated no concessions has been vindicated by supporters and keep same body off their back.
Option B mustn't happen and they'll do everything to make sure it doesn't, so load it. If it did then theres the consolation we have already voted to move from north stand. So they can get rid of that loathsome section. Many will go due to cost/ principle of been move. They'll ensure the rest are divided around the ground.

And all they actually did was try to consult with fans.
Click to expand...
Strikes me as manipulation rather than consultation!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kempton, askewshair, FER ARK and 3 others
I sit in W5 so do not seem to exist in any of these models..I don’t get any correspondence or phone calls about anything.
However I have recently received 3 letters about changing my direct debit collection method,
Has anyone else received these?
 
I think we should have a supporters ballot akin to the one he has organised. It would go something along the lines of he has two options.

Option a) having your ears cut off. Option b) having your tongue surgically removed. Option 'a' would not allow the individual to live within a 12,000 mile radius of Hull and he would have to dispose of all assets donating everything to the citizens of Hull. Option 'b' would require the individual to reside in rented accommodation as close as possible to the stadium, dispose of all assets (donating them to the club), volunteer to work at the ground for 30 hours a week and visit Geoff on a weekly basis to undertake whatever menial tasks he has lined up for him.

This would meet the criteria of owner/supporter consultation. The only drawback I can see with this plan is it would require a response rate of 100%.
 
Club just posted:

“Voting has now closed for the Ticket Model Vote. We'd like to thank all Members who took the time to participate.

We can confirm that we received 44.7% of votes and the results will be published this Friday, along with next steps.”
 
John Ex Aberdeen now E.R. said:
Well, I'm pleased it reached over 40%, even though the whole episode of these votes is idiotic, at least Ehab can't say the silent majority have had their say by not voting.

Though why wait until Friday for the result, surely they know the outcome now?
Click to expand...
you always need time to move the goal posts
 
  • Like
Reactions: brownbagtiger, Qatartiger Cambridgetiger, TwoWrights and 6 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back