Here you go, modern day football (social) media summed up.
It is especially applicable to a few posters on the premier league board;
There is an interesting paradox in modern society where people are free to be as uninformed as they like, but the moment someone points it out, they are considered the problem. Stupidity is often socially acceptable, and in some cases, even encouraged, whereas highlighting it is met with resistance. When someone expresses an opinion that is entirely based on misinformation, it is often tolerated or even defended, but when another person corrects them, they are suddenly perceived as rude or arrogant. It seems that ignorance is easier to accept than the discomfort of being proven wrong.
This situation is best explained by the Dunning-Kruger Paradox, which suggests that the less someone knows, the more confident they are in their knowledge, while those who actually understand a subject tend to question themselves more. Ignorance breeds overconfidence, whereas intelligence fosters doubt. As a result, those who know the least are often the loudest, and those who know the most are hesitant to speak. It creates an unfortunate dynamic where uninformed opinions are expressed with great certainty, and any attempt to correct them is seen as an attack.
It is an odd social norm. A person can confidently share a completely inaccurate fact they found online, and people will nod along politely. However, if someone corrects them with well-sourced information, the mood shifts, and the one providing accurate information is suddenly viewed as condescending. This leads to a world where people with no qualifications feel perfectly comfortable debating experts, and those with actual expertise must tread carefully to avoid upsetting those who don’t even realise how little they know.
Ignorance, it seems, enjoys full immunity, while intelligence is met with resistance. It is a curious arrangement, one that ensures misinformation continues to spread while accuracy remains an inconvenience.