https://x.com/ncfc024/status/1775546163086737583?s=46
Interesting it was said that the loanees can be disregarded.
Yikes
Thats a concern for next season
https://x.com/ncfc024/status/1775546163086737583?s=46
Interesting it was said that the loanees can be disregarded.
Of course it omits the fact that someone else would’ve been there instead. But I don’t think we’d have got anywhere near as good a loanees as Delap, Morton and Carvalho.Yikes
Thats a concern for next season
Yikes
Thats a concern for next season

https://x.com/ncfc024/status/1775546163086737583?s=46
Interesting it was said that the loanees can be disregarded.
Yes. It’s all goals scored by loanees taken out for everyoneWhat is the criteria for reducing points based on loan players? Is it just goals scored? Not a full picture really. Does it also take into account goals conceded because of loan players?
Yes. It’s all goals scored by loanees taken out for everyone
Just unsustainable that’s all. As you see all the teams around us who are also building long term projects are exactly where they are in the actual table. So they all immediately have a head start on our “long term project”.That's a totally worthless methodology.
Of course, we obviously do rely heavily on loan players as we already know regardless of what an unacademic mock table says; LR himself has said that's our way of competing with teams who can spend more. I expect it to be the same next season with mostly different loanees.
Just unsustainable that’s all. As you see all the teams around us who are also building long term projects are exactly where they are in the actual table. So they all immediately have a head start on our “long term project”.
Loans are great. But when you are trying to build long term you need more of your permanent match winners
Of course it omits the fact that someone else would’ve been there instead. But I don’t think we’d have got anywhere near as good a loanees as Delap, Morton and Carvalho.
Of course he’s brilliant for now and the future.I mean, we got Philogene on a permanent..
Just unsustainable that’s all. As you see all the teams around us who are also building long term projects are exactly where they are in the actual table. So they all immediately have a head start on our “long term project”.
Loans are great. But when you are trying to build long term you need more of your permanent match winners
Could be. But then, maybe the likes of Delap/Morton have enjoyed their time here and would consider a permanent move that would guarantee them games!![]()
Just unsustainable that’s all. As you see all the teams around us who are also building long term projects are exactly where they are in the actual table. So they all immediately have a head start on our “long term project”.
Loans are great. But when you are trying to build long term you need more of your permanent match winners
We might be able to spend what we want if this goes ahead. Unfortunately others in the Championship might be able to spend more. And if we go up we will be that far behind what the big ones, especially the oil clubs, can spend. Newcastle must be praying it goes through as they could outspend everybody except Man City.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/f...ay-Everton-Nottingham-Forest-lost-points.html
You think Acun would be in the pro lobby and right up Simon Jordans arse, writing open letters if it wouldn't help us?
Of course he’s brilliant for now and the future.
Not enough planning for next season happened this season should we not go up. Other than Omur and Pandur maybe.
Once all loanees are gone we are a bottom 6 side IMO.
Link?
Link?
Link?
That's a totally worthless methodology.
Of course, we obviously do rely heavily on loan players as we already know regardless of what an unacademic mock table says; LR himself has said that's our way of competing with teams who can spend more. I expect it to be the same next season with mostly different loanees.