January transfer thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Definitely need a striker. Listening to TM at the weekend I think he would quite like an Experienced CM for the rest of the season.
Cutting it fine but I think we will see a couple in before close of play.

Sorry yes I was focusing purely on striker. But we do ideally need both. Especially considering the decision to loan out Matete (which I still endorse)
 
how many players should be in the succession list for each position? Lets say its 2/3, lets say for whatever reason we cant get them over the line....what do you suggest?...breaking the pay structure? signing anybody just to keep some randoms on the net happy? In other words throwing the very plan that has us where we are out of the window
Did Speakman not say he was happy with 2 players for every position on the pitch in the summer?
 
Not sure I am seeing any of our rivals for promotion do any business I would have us do yet.

As in you wouldn’t take any player that they’ve signed or you wouldn’t spend the money that they have for said player? If the former then that’s a ridiculous statement.
 
Worst case scenario is we bring nobody in, finish towards the top of the bottom half, and the likes of Dan Neil, Michut, Ekwah, Ba, Hume, Ballard, Alese, Cirkin, Patterson have a whole year of Championship football behind them, heading into a new season with Ross Stewart back in training and ready to attack the league from a far greater position than we did this season

The only thing we can lose is the relatively small chance we have of promotion this season. Which is something we never achieved, so we aren't losing anything. And frankly if signing "any old striker" is the difference between promotion and no promotion I'll eat my hat.

The one thing we can all be sure of is that the club and recruitment team aren't intentionally sitting their thinking one striker is enough. They'll just not want to jeopardise future seasons.

That said, and as I said above, I would suggest we should be willing to bring in a player we otherwise wouldn't, to help the team do what they can to try to achieve promotion this season. But only if its at an acceptable, manageable cost.
 
Definitely need a striker. Listening to TM at the weekend I think he would quite like an Experienced CM for the rest of the season.
Cutting it fine but I think we will see a couple in before close of play.

Out of interest how many loans can we get in

You can have 5 loan players in your matchday squad. Stoke have just sent a few back and loaned 3 different players. Burnley have 5 in their squad every matchday.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sheepman
If we don’t get anybody else in I am comfortable with things as they are. It means that the club are not being pushed into silly last minute deals, in a season when the objective has always been to consolidate in this league with a very joint team, who will be much better next year , but would struggle if we went up. If we do go up we would have change our recruitment policy and bring in some more experienced players and that could rock the boat.

I was always happy to wait another year for promotion and see if we could have a good cup run.
 
Worst case scenario is we bring nobody in, finish towards the top of the bottom half, and the likes of Dan Neil, Michut, Ekwah, Ba, Hume, Ballard, Alese, Cirkin, Patterson have a whole year of Championship football behind them, heading into a new season with Ross Stewart back in training and ready to attack the league from a far greater position than we did this season

The only thing we can lose is the relatively small chance we have of promotion this season. Which is something we never achieved, so we aren't losing anything. And frankly if signing "any old striker" is the difference between promotion and no promotion I'll eat my hat.

The one thing we can all be sure of is that the club and recruitment team aren't intentionally sitting their thinking one striker is enough. They'll just not want to jeopardise future seasons.

That said, and as I said above, I would suggest we should be willing to bring in a player we otherwise wouldn't, to help the team do what they can to try to achieve promotion this season. But only if its at an acceptable, manageable cost.
Spot on, as a newly promoted club, in no danger of a relegation fight at the minute, think we’ve done well. It’s the potential opportunity missed that seems to be the issue for a lot of people, we’re close to the playoffs and that’s stirred up the aspirations in a few.