Any links to his posts about that?
Apologies, if I’ve touched a nerve there.
Any links to his posts about that?
https://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/news/err-nerr-hull-road-sign-2324619
What kind of moronic snobby student **** do the HDM employ these days?
Do other parts of the country have articles mocking their local accent?
Liverpool?
Manchester?
Norwich?
Apologies, if I’ve touched a nerve there.
You haven't touched a nerve. Just interested in a link to his posts stating what you said he has.
That's great then.
Relieved.
The HDM was in a state of high dudgeon about "savage snobs" placing Hull 7th on a list of worst places to live, interviewing people who said they didn't know what a great city it was etc...If the HDM ever checked things they would have seen it was based on them asking people who lived in each city or town thought of where they lived. Someone should have a word with the good citizens of Hull who think less of their city than the residents of Luton, Middlesbrough and other places. Though Liverpool residents have a lower opinion of where they live than Hull's.
So you have no evidence then, just supposition or psychic powers?
Aren't you the one who is always saying that the people in Hull think the city is great when in fact it really isn't ?
Supposition.
You nailed it you champ.
Supposition. The ultimate proof.
Don't like Davison particularly but I do remember reading an article by Craig Charles. When he was accused of rape everyone dropped him like a hot potato, his appearances on shows were cancelled. The one exception was Davison who was then at the peak of his career. He said everyone is innocent until proved guilty and told the TV company if Charles didn't appear he wouldn't do the show. Support from the supposedly racist, politically incorrect Davison, none from the right on luvvies and liberals.
"none from the right on luvvies and liberals."
Can't say I personally like right-on luvvies and liberals (per se) but have you got a link to support that assertion?
Well, Charles said Davison was the only one who supported him it therefore follows if he was the only one who did then no right on luvvies and liberals did.
They avoided bin dipper, but covered pretty much everything else...
https://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/news/liverpool-news/liverpool-sayings-top-26-things-6463028
We've lost the mantle of the worst place to live then.... !!!The HDM was in a state of high dudgeon about "savage snobs" placing Hull 7th on a list of worst places to live, interviewing people who said they didn't know what a great city it was etc...If the HDM ever checked things they would have seen it was based on them asking people who lived in each city or town thought of where they lived. Someone should have a word with the good citizens of Hull who think less of their city than the residents of Luton, Middlesbrough and other places. Though Liverpool residents have a lower opinion of where they live than Hull's.
We've lost the mantle of the worst place to live then.... !!!
In those 'surveys', it's like the 'writer' is some miserable friendless adolescent who blames his plight on the local environment and natives.The odd thing is the the review of each 'crap town' is almost identical....with copious references to 'chavs'.
To be taken with a pinch of salt, or better still ignored as the work of witless knaves.
Here are some of the places I have been to in the UK and thought I would not like to live:
- Croydon
-Rotherham
-Walsall
-Watford
-Hartlepool
-Milton Keynes
Places with no distinct identity, very little of note historically or culturally, in the shadow of somewhere else bigger nearby.
Not having a dig at these places just calling it as I see it.
Awful places. But all better than Luton.That survey asked residents of the towns and cities their thoughts. I read some of it, Bristol residents were particularly scathing of their own city. Surprised at the low ranking of Liverpool, not because I rate the place but because every Scouser I have met thinks the place is wonderful.
Presumably you haven't been to Blackburn, Bolton, Burnley or Preston?Awful places. But all better than Luton.
Hartlepool has no history of note? ****ing hell that’s halfwitted.In those 'surveys', it's like the 'writer' is some miserable friendless adolescent who blames his plight on the local environment and natives.The odd thing is the the review of each 'crap town' is almost identical....with copious references to 'chavs'.
To be taken with a pinch of salt, or better still ignored as the work of witless knaves.
Here are some of the places I have been to in the UK and thought I would not like to live:
- Croydon
-Rotherham
-Walsall
-Watford
-Hartlepool
-Milton Keynes
Places with no distinct identity, very little of note historically or culturally, in the shadow of somewhere else bigger nearby.
Not having a dig at these places just calling it as I see it.