Hernandez

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
originallambrettaman said:
City have moved on and improved, just be happy about it.
Click to expand...

We have moved on, and I hope we have improved.
Not sure how after 3 games anyone can say Phelan is the messiah (or opposite....)

He's done very well in extraordinary circumstances, where he has had no options and very few decisions to make.
Hope it all works out well with Phelan, but I suspect that if it doesn't it will be loudest pro Phelan voices now who will be loudest PHELAN OUT ****ers later.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DMD
City Man said:
We have moved on, and I hope we have improved.
Not sure how after 3 games anyone can say Phelan is the messiah (or opposite....)

He's done very well in extraordinary circumstances, where he has had no options and very few decisions to make.
Hope it all works out well with Phelan, but I suspect that if it doesn't it will be loudest pro Phelan voices now who will be loudest PHELAN OUT ****ers later.
Click to expand...

As usual you're making up bollocks about what people have said. People aren't hailing Phelan as the messiah, they're just saying he's done enough to warrant being appointed permanently.

He's had limited option with player numbers, but he's done brilliantly with what he's got. Bruce would have had Clucas left wing and Dio up front with Abel, Phelan's come up with a far better way of utilising the players available.

If people change their opinions, at least you'll be able to do your usual 'armchair manager ****s' nonsense all over again.
 
  • Like
Reactions: John Ex Aberdeen now E.R.
City Man said:
We have moved on, and I hope we have improved.
Not sure how after 3 games anyone can say Phelan is the messiah (or opposite....)

He's done very well in extraordinary circumstances, where he has had no options and very few decisions to make.
Hope it all works out well with Phelan, but I suspect that if it doesn't it will be loudest pro Phelan voices now who will be loudest PHELAN OUT ****ers later.
Click to expand...

Does that mean you still have to see us play under him then...? OR..... does that mean that you were unhappy with the way we played under your personal messiah SB.
 
Phelan's done brilliantly in very trying circumstamnces. That said with the new Chinese owners having not given him the role already, suggests to me that he'll get the gig to January with the message to prove himself with some players he's introduced to the squad, and go from there.
 
£20million and we rejected? , I guess if we have money we can but he's not worth that at all. I would have bit their hands off if it wasn't for the takeover.
Whoever they do sign will love to know they are
"The other option"
 
originallambrettaman said:
As usual you're making up bollocks about what people have said. People aren't hailing Phelan as the messiah, they're just saying he's done enough to warrant being appointed permanently.

He's had limited option with player numbers, but he's done brilliantly with what he's got. Bruce would have had Clucas left wing and Dio up front with Abel, Phelan's come up with a far better way of utilising the players available.

If people change their opinions, at least you'll be able to do your usual 'armchair manager ****s' nonsense all over again.
Click to expand...

He didn't say people had hailed Phelan as the new Messiah. He said it was too early to hail him as the new Messiah or the opposite.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DMD
He's not worth £20m, but what's that got to do with it?

None of the big money signings are worth their price tags.

We're playing a crazy market so why should Hull City be the only ones asking a fair price?

You ask the going rate.
 
TIGERSCAVE said:
Does that mean you still have to see us play under him then...? OR..... does that mean that you were unhappy with the way we played under your personal messiah SB.
Click to expand...
It means 3 games is too short a time to assess.

I know in poodleworld, where silly ****s overreact to very victory or defeat, Phelo is flavour of month.

However, in the real world, optimism is tempered with caution and a long term perspective.

I don't give a **** who manages City, as long as they improve us or do a good job for us.
It's the bipolar fickle ****s who undermine the manager that sadden me.
 
City Man said:
It means 3 games is too short a time to assess.

I know in poodleworld, where silly ****s overreact to very victory or defeat, Phelo is flavour of month.

However, in the real world, optimism is tempered with caution and a long term perspective.

I don't give a **** who manages City, as long as they improve us or do a good job for us.
It's the bipolar fickle ****s who undermine the manager that sadden me.
Click to expand...
Nothing could make you sadder than you already are.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BOJACKHCAFCMAN
City Man said:
It means 3 games is too short a time to assess.

I know in poodleworld, where silly ****s overreact to very victory or defeat, Phelo is flavour of month.

However, in the real world, optimism is tempered with caution and a long term perspective.

I don't give a **** who manages City, as long as they improve us or do a good job for us.
It's the bipolar fickle ****s who undermine the manager that sadden me.
Click to expand...

So why should everything the manager does be taken as gospel? Why isn't it up for debate and why, according to you, do you need a pro license to have an opinion on any football related discussion? Do you need the relevent qualification in something before you criticise it?
 
Sterling Archer said:
So why should everything the manager does be taken as gospel? Why isn't it up for debate and why, according to you, do you need a pro license to have an opinion on any football related discussion? Do you need the relevent qualification in something before you criticise it?
Click to expand...

Relevant.
It's spelt 'relevant'.
 
He's derailing another thread with his bullshit, I came here to read about Hernandez? If they ban Patty they should ban this nobber too
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back