We have moved on, and I hope we have improved. Not sure how after 3 games anyone can say Phelan is the messiah (or opposite....) He's done very well in extraordinary circumstances, where he has had no options and very few decisions to make. Hope it all works out well with Phelan, but I suspect that if it doesn't it will be loudest pro Phelan voices now who will be loudest PHELAN OUT ****ers later.
As usual you're making up bollocks about what people have said. People aren't hailing Phelan as the messiah, they're just saying he's done enough to warrant being appointed permanently. He's had limited option with player numbers, but he's done brilliantly with what he's got. Bruce would have had Clucas left wing and Dio up front with Abel, Phelan's come up with a far better way of utilising the players available. If people change their opinions, at least you'll be able to do your usual 'armchair manager ****s' nonsense all over again.
Does that mean you still have to see us play under him then...? OR..... does that mean that you were unhappy with the way we played under your personal messiah SB.
Phelan's done brilliantly in very trying circumstamnces. That said with the new Chinese owners having not given him the role already, suggests to me that he'll get the gig to January with the message to prove himself with some players he's introduced to the squad, and go from there.
£20million and we rejected? , I guess if we have money we can but he's not worth that at all. I would have bit their hands off if it wasn't for the takeover. Whoever they do sign will love to know they are "The other option"
He didn't say people had hailed Phelan as the new Messiah. He said it was too early to hail him as the new Messiah or the opposite.
He's not worth £20m, but what's that got to do with it? None of the big money signings are worth their price tags. We're playing a crazy market so why should Hull City be the only ones asking a fair price? You ask the going rate.
It means 3 games is too short a time to assess. I know in poodleworld, where silly ****s overreact to very victory or defeat, Phelo is flavour of month. However, in the real world, optimism is tempered with caution and a long term perspective. I don't give a **** who manages City, as long as they improve us or do a good job for us. It's the bipolar fickle ****s who undermine the manager that sadden me.
So why should everything the manager does be taken as gospel? Why isn't it up for debate and why, according to you, do you need a pro license to have an opinion on any football related discussion? Do you need the relevent qualification in something before you criticise it?
It is, not sure why my phone auto corrected it. But way to dodge the questions. You could have answered them, instead you chose to correct an automatic typo. That about sums you up.
He's derailing another thread with his bullshit, I came here to read about Hernandez? If they ban Patty they should ban this nobber too
Tedious pedantry from the spelling police, is this a thread about Hernandez or about silly old buggers spouting off?
