And they'd be the sam apathetic passive majority who sit gormlessly accepting this name change ****?![]()
That's right Reg, court support from the majority by resorting to insults. Really thought that through, dintcha?
And they'd be the sam apathetic passive majority who sit gormlessly accepting this name change ****?![]()
Not one of the suggestions I made would affect the team in any way; well, they would see that some supporters think the name-change is a crock of ****, but I would be willing to bet they think that anyway. I do agree that it will be nigh-on impossible to animate the apathetic supporters who see what Allam is doing as just one of those things.
Personal opinion. My old man went to City but hated it. He always wanted to win the pools and buy City. First thing he would do, and i heard this every week, sack the lot of em the tea lady the cleaner right up to the top. They're all comfortable and revel in mediocrity, they dont want to go anywhere, they dont want first division football and never did.
I see Mr Allam come in and do everything my old man would have done. Even the fans ANectar PLT yourself, why are we sacking so and so he's been here years? They've got no one who knows how to organise a transfer, they wont know how to pick a manager, everything's ****ed, they are clueless. He's senile, he's mad as a box of frogs.
When to me he's got the midas touch. He will have been in contact with other Premier league chairmen, a lot of whom are Yanks, they will be looking at branding and merchandising etc, he's like a sponge soaking up info. He doesnt want to hurt this club he wants what is best for the club and I will support him in that.
If people want to protest thats their choice, but dont hurt the team on the pitch which is the most important thing.
This is what I put forward as ideas:
“How about the crowd turning their backs at kick-off, or when a goal is scored; something that will be seen when the camera pans the stands. If everyone boycotted the match-day programs, food, drink and betting he would be made to focus where it matters to him - his commercial relationships. The Official Supporters Club and any other formally acknowledged supporter liaison should suspend all scheduled meetings of a routine nature until some acceptable form of consultation is put in place. The national supporters body (as involved in the bubble fiasco) should be an important part of this, as should invited elements of the media. We should be transparent of action and intent, peaceful in approach and collaborative with broader elements who show an interest in the key concerns we have - those key concerns should be carefully and clearly declared, so progress can be measured and seen to be achieved.”
“The West Stand should all turn to face the Lack-of-Direction Box and big foam hands pointing the fickle-finger-of-fate would be a great move. This should be staged at a big gate occasion after some proper preparation and continued through to the new year. Non-cooperation from fans support groups - suspension of normal meetings, etc. are essential in expressing the disapproval of his current customers, the very people he should be working very hard to retain. He has made it a point of business strategy, so show the silly old fool that we understand our position - Gerald Ratner found out the hard way.”
So you're struggling to get 40 supporters to stand behind a banner, but getting the whole stand to synchronously turn their back should be a piece of cake in comparison.
The problem seems to be that while this has been going on for a month now, we haven't been able to discuss how to go forward with protesting it because every time it's mentioned on the forums it becomes a pissy debate about whether it is even worth protesting. The likes of tubby, patty, Diddy and Dazed are so determined to argue that it isn't worth protesting that everyone's energy is wasted on this pointless debate between ourselves. We should all have agreed long ago we need to do something about it and should be talking about how and what.
To the likes of tubby and the others I mentioned above, how about you let it go? We all know you're against anyone doing anything, your point is made. There's nothing to achieve. Some of you have even admitted you don't want the name change so the rest of us are trying to fight on your behalf. Just let us get on with it. The debates on this topic no longer concern you if what you say is true.
I am not against ppl doing anything, don't get me wrong, however I just think that change can be good.
Look at Cardiff as an example.
I'm in the "suck it and see" camp.
if it adversely affects the club, AA has to do an embarrassing climb down and change the name back.
But to keep the name for emotive reasons?
I trust a business man to make money.
What's your idea then?
What i don't get with all this is the people who think it's ok to do away with the name, all seem to be saying, well if it was the colours, the nickname or the badge it would be different.
Why is it?
Hull City has been our name since we were formed, and it's older than the club's colours, the crest and the nickname. Infact it's the oldest thing about the club.
Tradition would be in tatters if we did away with it.
...more emotive ****?
case?
rested
...more emotive ****?
case?
rested
To me Hull City AFC represents my community, it is part of me, like an extended family. The name represents all those supporters who struggled to keep the club alive since its formation. Its part of our collective heritage. It says my football club belongs to me and my community. It is not a business belonging to Allamhouse for it to do whatever it wants.