It’s benefited us and I think it was a joke! Can’t be ruling out them, football is about goals
the rule is offside , not oh this is more exciting lets give it
It’s benefited us and I think it was a joke! Can’t be ruling out them, football is about goals
the rule is offside , not oh this is more exciting lets give it
He’s not gained an advantage from it though that should be the point.the rule is offside , not oh this is more exciting lets give it
the rule is offside , not oh this is more exciting lets give it
Because it’s making the game even more sterile.
Because VAR was only intended to overrule clear and obvious errors.why is every offside goal given offside by VAR reported as controversial ? it was offside ffs.
They can’t guarantee it even is offside though. Just go with an umpire’s call type of thing when the tech isn’t good enough to say for sure.
Or just scrap it because it’s **** and supported by freaks.
the same people were winging when an offside goal went against them.. nowts changed they just like a cry
Fair enough. Hope you enjoy the inevitable advert breaks while they’re reviewing the offside decisions that even Mr VAR isn’t 100% certain about.the rule is offside , not oh this is more exciting lets give it
the fact is that is the rule, so regardless its not controversial.
we can disagree with there being zero margin of favour to attackers, but its not a controversial decision is my point.
the same people were winging when an offside goal went against them.. nowts changed they just like a cry
Fair enough. Hope you enjoy the inevitable advert breaks while they’re reviewing the offside decisions that even Mr VAR isn’t 100% certain about.
The Beautiful Game.
It needs either a change to the offside rule that accounts for the VAR era or they simply make it a visual VAR check minus the lines, that if it’s clear and obvious is awarded as offside, if not, it isn’t given. Should take 30 seconds tops.thats a seperate argument.
it needs working on
You're ignoring the fact that the technology isn't accurate enough when it's that close - The margin of error is larger than the amount judged offside.
So again, prove it was offside.
It needs either a change to the offside rule that accounts for the VAR era or they simply make it a visual VAR check minus the lines, that if it’s clear and obvious is awarded as offside, if not, it isn’t given. Should take 30 seconds tops.
its the same rule for everyone using the same technology and guidelines so its not controversial .
offside goals or not offside goals given by an obvious margin would be controversial
nobody has heard anyone complaining as they have in the past about goals given yards offside ..
theres many good things var has done, but sadly people lack enough omega 3 in their diet to remember or consider.
its the same rule for everyone using the same technology and guidelines so its not controversial .
offside goals or not offside goals given by an obvious margin would be controversial
nobody has heard anyone complaining as they have in the past about goals given yards offside ..
theres many good things var has done, but sadly people lack enough omega 3 in their diet to remember or consider.
It needs either a change to the offside rule that accounts for the VAR era or they simply make it a visual VAR check minus the lines, that if it’s clear and obvious is awarded as offside, if not, it isn’t given. Should take 30 seconds tops.