General Election 2019

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

General Election 2019

  • Labour

    Votes: 12 36.4%
  • Tory

    Votes: 9 27.3%
  • Lib. Dem

    Votes: 6 18.2%
  • Green Party

    Votes: 1 3.0%
  • Brexit Party

    Votes: 2 6.1%
  • SNP

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Plaid Cymru

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • None of the above

    Votes: 2 6.1%
  • My legs because they support me

    Votes: 1 3.0%

  • Total voters
    33
Status
Not open for further replies.
The last real poll taken in 2017 showed that the public didn't trust the Tories enough to give them a majority. You can argue why and talk numbers, but under the first past the post electoral system they lost the slim majority they held. It is also worth remembering that out of your ten years another five only took place as they were propped up by the LibDems.

The Tories have been the largest party and the most popular for the last 10 years, they remain favourites to continue this trend. The UK clearly prefers Johnson as the best leader and the Tories as the best option to run the country.
 
Keir Starmer looked really silly today with his car crash interview with Susanna Reid. He is proposing a second referendum in six months and may vote against his 'really good newly negotiated deal' with the EU. No wonder the public are so confused and put off by this weird stance.
 
Twice within a week Facebook has taken down adverts from the Tories. Seems that we are back to the misinformation regime already, and the election campaign has hardly started.
 
Some days you almost have to feel sorry for a junior minister being sent along to answer an urgent question in the Commons, and today was one of them. Not a soul from either side of the house believed what he had to say about suppressing the report into Russian involvement in UK politics. Tried as hard as he could diversion didn't work, trying to make out that it was all quite normal didn't get believed, so poor old Chris Pincher was left looking a fool. We see players committing fouls and receiving a yellow card, which is described as taking one for the team. I think Pincher would have been happy to have had a straight red and immediately put out of his misery.
 
Some days you almost have to feel sorry for a junior minister being sent along to answer an urgent question in the Commons, and today was one of them. Not a soul from either side of the house believed what he had to say about suppressing the report into Russian involvement in UK politics. Tried as hard as he could diversion didn't work, trying to make out that it was all quite normal didn't get believed, so poor old Chris Pincher was left looking a fool. We see players committing fouls and receiving a yellow card, which is described as taking one for the team. I think Pincher would have been happy to have had a straight red and immediately put out of his misery.

The timescale for the release of this report is similar to many others, this is a non-story despite desperate attempts to fabricate one.
 
The timescale for the release of this report is similar to many others, this is a non-story despite desperate attempts to fabricate one.

What about all the others? I mentioned a few in my post earlier.

As OFH mentioned, where are all the new affordable houses the Tories promised to build?

Why has the magic money tree reappeared for the Tories, and why aren't you furious about the Government spending money it doesn't have?

So many questions...And I suspect so few answers...
 
The timescale for the release of this report is similar to many others, this is a non-story despite desperate attempts to fabricate one.

Oh dear, the Chris Pincher of the Watford board. Non-story? It is now all over the papers, TV and radio.
 
What about all the others? I mentioned a few in my post earlier.

As OFH mentioned, where are all the new affordable houses the Tories promised to build?

Why has the magic money tree reappeared for the Tories, and why aren't you furious about the Government spending money it doesn't have?

So many questions...And I suspect so few answers...

The Tories responsible belt tightening since 2008 has enabled them to release the purse strings a little. Labour's unfunded spending splurge would put us in a predicament similar to debt mountain France.
 
It would be rather said if people's choice for the next government come down to their respective positions on Brexit Fez. The British people deserve more than just a one theme election. I could see some sort of future for Britain both inside, and outside, of the EU. so the question is which party should have the decisive say on that future ? There are millions of people in the UK who will be voting for either their second or their third choice at this election - voting against something rather than what they actually want - the only loser in that scenario is democracy itself. My first choice, based on policies, would be the Green Party, followed by Labour and then the Lib Dems. I could well consider a Lib Dem vote in the right constituency because I want to see PR. in the UK and Labour does not have this on their agenda. As for our poll there are many 'travellers' on these boards - people who use several boards - and so there is no guarantee that the 7 Tories belong to us.
You're right for the most part, but I think a "People's Vote" on the EU issue is absolutely necessary. I think that there needs to be a clear mandate for whatever decision is made: Deal, no deal, revoke. Pigs to the trough within the EU need to be addressed; vultures to the carcass post-leave need to be avoided full stop. Any deal needs to fully respect the GFA; no deal cannot be implemented without fully respecting the GFA or unilateral agreement between the UK & Irish governments and other parties involved in negotiating the original agreement: peace is paramount... you vote to ignore the GFA and the bombs start going off again then I will be paying yoos a visit. And if the GFA and no deal are as mutually exclusive as I suspect that they are then we don't leave.

There are several issues that get my consideration:
NHS - obviously not remotely safe with the Tory vultures circling.
Emergency Services - ditto.

Taxation - the tories have history of serving themselves, this needs to stop both in private taxation and, especially, corporately. A much fairer distribution so that food banks are a thing of the past PFDQ. Ultimately a significant redistribution of wealth is required: the gap is now way too big. Earn more, pay more. Oh yes, and close these damned offshore loopholes. Nothing more unpatriotic than not paying your taxes.
That said it's pointless to discourage people to not make good money and create jobs: but do we need the likes of Bezos and his ilk, really?

Welfare - at present the system of UC is nothing short of criminal. Ministers, managers, assessors need to be held to account. People are dying in what is supposedly the 5th richest economy in the world. That's criminal and totally immoral.

Defence - in terms of the armed forces I do not think that JC is a healthy option. The overall defence of the Realm (armed forces, cyber security, international cooperation) is not safe with the selfservatives either... we need to start listening a bit more to those in charge of our security, not ill informed ministers and their "advisors"; implement the immigration rules already at our disposal; properly resolve the Windrush scandal and, again, hold the instigators and enforcers to account.

Housing - successive policies have failed, there needs to be a rethink. The current situation is unsustainable. Private landlords get away with far too much, sullying the name of the good ones.

Infrastructure - chronic poorly judged investment in our roads that need addressing; renationalise the railways; cancel HS2 NOW and invest in the existing infrastructure, extended platform lengths wherever practicable and rolling stock; better planning of our airports and proper compensation for the residents nearby; renationlise the Post Office (another selfservative pension grab looms); profit cap for the Water and energy companies with independent auditing (no, I don't trust them to be honest about their profits) and minimum reinvestment levels.

Education - a ban on faith schools; ditto home schooling (exceptional circumstances to apply); significant reduction (preferably removal) of HE fees; removal of charitable status for public schools; rethink regarding curriculum and league tables.

Parliament - pay capped to national levels: none of this 10% for MPs and 1% for nurses BS; stricter audit on MPs expenses; stricter control of nepotism.

Environment - HS2, Fracking to be halted immediately; Review of environmental protection; Energy policy review with more sustainable methods, particularly refuse incineration. Over the wider canvas, as annoying as Greta is I do happen to think she's more correct than wrong. Significantly so.

Do I claim to have the answers? No. But I can and do identify most of the problems, most of those listed above are avoidable. Better minds than mine can solve them.
If that little lot sounds a bit Socialist then that's merely a consequence of putting people before profit; society ahead of corporate greed; common good before personal interest.

Rant over, thanks for reading.
 
After the 2017 election where the polls showed a large majority for the Tories right up to the last days before it took place, you have to wonder where they get their results from. The latest poll by ICM taken since the election was called shows a narrowing of the lead, only 7% now.

The latest poll by the respected YouGov pollsters give the Tories a 13% lead over Labour. Tories remain on 38% Labour down 2%



You must log in or register to see images








You must log in or register to see images
 
So this happened. The Conservative Party took an interview from
@GMB
this morning. They edited it to add on the last shot in which Keir Starmer looks stumped. But that didn't happen. In the original Keir Starmer immediately answered. You can see both versions on-line. Just how low can you sink? I see that SH was taken in by it from his comments above.
 
Philiip Hammond has finally realised his role in trying to sabotage Brexit has come home to roost. He has announce he will not stand again as an independent in his constituency, the goodwill he had built up had been ruined by selfish personal ambition. No doubt a position in the City with a pro EU company has been secured.
 
So this happened. The Conservative Party took an interview from
@GMB
this morning. They edited it to add on the last shot in which Keir Starmer looks stumped. But that didn't happen. In the original Keir Starmer immediately answered. You can see both versions on-line. Just how low can you sink? I see that SH was taken in by it from his comments above.

Keir Starmer looks bewildered in most of his interviews, it is obviously difficult to defend such a ridiculous stance. The two warring sides of Labour has caused a stalemate which has seriously damaged its election chances.
 
So this happened. The Conservative Party took an interview from
@GMB
this morning. They edited it to add on the last shot in which Keir Starmer looks stumped. But that didn't happen. In the original Keir Starmer immediately answered. You can see both versions on-line. Just how low can you sink? I see that SH was taken in by it from his comments above.

This will be happening constantly

https://www.theguardian.com/technol...acebook-ad-worked-on-fake-grassroots-campaign

It's disgusting, manipulative and deceitful behaviour. Why am I not surprised...
 
Keir Starmer looks bewildered in most of his interviews, it is obviously difficult to defend such a ridiculous stance. The two warring sides of Labour has caused a stalemate which has seriously damaged its election chances.
What Labour is saying is that they will negotiate a deal with the EU. which does not damage workers rights or weaken environmental laws and will then put this to a referendum - how is this a ridiculous stance ? It is true that remaining in the middle on the Brexit argument is a dangerous place to be because they can lose votes (or gain them) from all sides. They are remaining in the middle in a dangerously polarized political climate - but that is the only stance which can work towards the reconciliation process.
 
What Labour is saying is that they will negotiate a deal with the EU. which does not damage workers rights or weaken environmental laws and will then put this to a referendum - how is this a ridiculous stance ? It is true that remaining in the middle on the Brexit argument is a dangerous place to be because they can lose votes (or gain them) from all sides. They are remaining in the middle in a dangerously polarized political climate - but that is the only stance which can work towards the reconciliation process.

You should encourage Labour to keep this daft stance, the public have no time for it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.