FPP to take full control

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Standard 'mate at the academy' patter.

I sincerely hope he's right and I get to come in here soon and say 'smug, your info was great, I should never have doubted your contacts, we now have the best possible owners'. I mean that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: smithy in nl
Standard 'mate at the academy' patter.

I sincerely hope he's right and I get to come in here soon and say 'smug, your info was great, I should never have doubted your contacts, we now have the best possible owners'. I mean that.

He's PMd me stuff before that turned out to be true (most recently after the fans statement he PMd and said Donald was selling, that was the day before Donald came out and said it, but he's got other things right as well). I'd definitely trust him, but obviously he's saying it's a different source this time so we can't be certain it's accurate. Would make sense though
 
Well he was factually incorrect, that's the absolute best case. I think it's more likely it was a joke based on the 'done deal' patter emanating from the press.

Dear me, you've never met either of the people concerned ....

.... yet you can invent another scenario to suit your needs.

At the time I posted my original comments, based on the messages and one other source, no one had even mentioned 'done deal'.
 
He's PMd me stuff before that turned out to be true (most recently after the fans statement he PMd and said Donald was selling, that was the day before Donald came out and said it, but he's got other things right as well). I'd definitely trust him, but obviously he's saying it's a different source this time so we can't be certain it's accurate. Would make sense though

He's a good lad and slips under the troll radar most of the time.

We both do the same thing and pm people if there are things we can't post.

I pm'd a few facts yesterday, I was asked not to post, to a lad on here who I know I can trust.

This is why people back me up when these facts subsequently come out.

We've spoken, in the past, so I believe you know what I'm saying.
 
Dear me, you've never met either of the people concerned ....

.... yet you can invent another scenario to suit your needs.

At the time I posted my original comments, based on the messages and one other source, no one had even mentioned 'done deal'.

Well I was trying to be generous to someone who was completely wrong, and is factually not our owner. You can say 'yet' as much as you like, it was complete bollocks and remains that.
 
Well I was trying to be generous to someone who was completely wrong, and is factually not our owner. You can say 'yet' as much as you like, it was complete bollocks and remains that.

I found it interesting that, to all intents and purposes, you were arrogant enough to call G.O.M. a liar on RTG.

For a burger flipper you do have an inflated sense opf your own knowledge/abilities.
 
I found it interesting that, to all intents and purposes, you were arrogant enough to call G.O.M. a liar on RTG.

For a burger flipper you do have an inflated sense opf your own knowledge/abilities.

You are genuinely deranged. Seriously, seek actual help for your weird obsession with me being whoever this is referring to. Remember when you spent ages telling people I was someone else on RTG? Shall I search for your mental posts or post your insane nasty PMS to me that indicate you are a nutjob? Remember when the mods had to get involved because you were being such a weirdo?

Unlike you, GOM was capable of actually responding in a sane way. I didn't call him a liar, I merely reminded him that he was trotting out the exact verbatim line I was using last summer and that he argued with me about at the time. I was quite polite about it too, and did so in good humour.
 
He's a good lad and slips under the troll radar most of the time.

We both do the same thing and pm people if there are things we can't post.

I pm'd a few facts yesterday, I was asked not to post, to a lad on here who I know I can trust.

This is why people back me up when these facts subsequently come out.

We've spoken, in the past, so I believe you know what I'm saying.
He's a good lad and slips under the troll radar most of the time.

We both do the same thing and pm people if there are things we can't post.

I pm'd a few facts yesterday, I was asked not to post, to a lad on here who I know I can trust.

This is why people back me up when these facts subsequently come out.

We've spoken, in the past, so I believe you know what I'm saying.

Do you have the same info as mr chuckles?
 
You are genuinely deranged. Seriously, seek actual help for your weird obsession with me being whoever this is referring to. Remember when you spent ages telling people I was someone else on RTG? Shall I search for your mental posts or post your insane nasty PMS to me that indicate you are a nutjob? Remember when the mods had to get involved because you were being such a weirdo?

Unlike you, GOM was capable of actually responding in a sane way. I didn't call him a liar, I merely reminded him that he was trotting out the exact verbatim line I was using last summer and that he argued with me about at the time. I was quite polite about it too, and did so in good humour.

Please do, all that will do is demonstrate your lack of memory and analytical ability to all.

I also find it very interesting that you are prepared to label someone else as 'deranged' and a 'nut job' given the way that you demonstrate your mental health problems and paranoia in your every post.

Regarding G.O.M., given the first word you used when replying to his recollection of an exchange of posts between you was "Nope" I think that more than justifies my interpretation.

Especially given his reputation for having a seeming obsession with accuracy and factual recall.
 
Last edited:
I found it interesting that, to all intents and purposes, you were arrogant enough to call G.O.M. a liar on RTG.

For a burger flipper you do have an inflated sense opf your own knowledge/abilities.
No irony in you labeling someone arrogant
 
No irony in you labeling someone arrogant

I'm still waiting for a reply to my question "Are you suggesting that I'm a Luddite".

It appears that you are very quick to throw insults around but then become dumb when asked to justify them!

Could it be that you are only trying to get attention and not enter into any form of debate?

It's, currently, looking that way!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nathan Brazil
Only you could find offence in the word 'nope'

'Snowflake generation' indeed.

I wasn't in the least offended, only pointing out that your use of the word was a rebuttal of what he'd posted and therefore was tantamount to calling him a liar.
 
Last edited:
This is what Owld Fella sent me a few months ago. I wouldn't ordinarily post a DM but he um, already posted a heavily redacted version of what I said, so it feels like it's time people understood just what kind of a nasty, vindictive man he is. For context, remember he thinks me using the word 'nope' at the start of a post is insulting :D this argument was subsequently picked up by other posters, but none have actually continued once I went back to RTG after my 2 month ban.


Owld Feller said:
I can always be civil and believe I normally am.
However, you posted this and so I've responded accordingly.

Kittenmittons said:
I won't say what I do but 1) I have plenty of experience of running a business, 2) getting external investment, and 3) company accounts and interpreting them. 4) My partner also works in Mergers and Acquisitions for a big 4 firm, so in a nutshell, 5) I do know what I'm talking about, and I wouldn't be banging on about it if it wasn't potentially putting the club's future in jeopardy.

Owld Feller said:
I can remember an RTG poster who admitted his autism but always used to overstate his knowledge/abilities and:

a) Was admitted to Sunderland Poly/Uni, without any qualifications, under its 'equal opportunities' program to study a business management program and claimed to have a degree (I've no idea if he did or did not obtain one) but could tie in with your claim in 3) above.

b) Used to sometimes be allowed to look after his father's Seaburn amusement business, whilst flipping burgers, or selling bags of potatoes from a van at the roadside, which would tie in with your claim in 1) above.

c) Was also allowed to give change for the slot machines, which would tie in with your claim in 2) above.

d) Had a very attractive wife (Trev) who I always wondered if his father wasn't paying to be his carer, given he always appeared to lead his own life (not involving her) which could possibly tie in with 4) above.

He, also. had a penchant for claiming anyone questioning him was making 'personal attacks' on him (much like 'Suicide Steve') and insisting he was always right/knew better than anyone else whilst ignoring educated responses from other posters.

Now, I'm not stating (as a fact) that you are one and the same person but, as Loyd Grossman might say, "The clues are there"!

Who is/was this poster I hear you ask?

His first incarnation, that I can recall, was as 'Emseab', who had a preoccupation with posting his sketches of male genitalia, then resurfaced on numerous occasions as 'Death Trooper', 'Desert Dweller' etc - he must hold the record for the number of different RTG user names held.

He was, clearly, a bright bloke but one who, at times, seemingly allowed his mental problems to take over his life/posts.

Regarding your attached file.

Did you, or did you not have a lengthy debate with @@Nads whereby you both concurred that the amount SD owed to the club was less than 5M.

Given that, I find it difficult to understand why, once again, have reverted to your claim he owes SAFC 20M.

Of course the funniest thing is that me and GOM were literally discussing how Madrox handles the £20-25m debt last night in the posts he talks about :D turns out if GOM is your standard, then maybe you should reevaluate your take on me, since he's now in agreement with a number of things I said in the summer, including the money used for shares and the scale of the debt.

Anyway, how would all of you deal with a psycho like this? Ignoring is difficult because it doesn't seem to stop him posting bile about me without my knowledge.
 
Last edited:
This is what Owld Fella sent me a few months ago. I wouldn't ordinarily post a DM but he um, already posted a heavily redacted version of what I said, so it feels like it's time people understood just what kind of a nasty, vindictive man he is. For context, remember he thinks me using the word 'nope' at the start of a post is insulting :D this argument was subsequently picked up by other posters, but none have actually continued once I went back to RTG after my 2 month ban.








Of course the funniest thing is that me and GOM were literally discussing how Madrox handles the £20-25m debt last night in the posts he talks about :D turns out if GOM is your standard, then maybe you should reevaluate your take on me, since he's now in agreement with a number of things I said in the summer, including the money used for shares and the scale of the debt.

Anyway, how would all of you deal with a psycho like this? Ignoring is difficult because it doesn't seem to stop him posting bile about me without my knowledge.

I have NO problems standing by anything contained in that.

All I would add is that I believe you should attempt to keep your 'problems' under control instead of repeatedly demonstrating them to all and sundry.

Failure to do so just reinforces the opinions of those (myself included) who view you as a BGB (big girl's blouse).

:emoticon-0102-bigsm
 
I have NO problems standing by anything contained in that.

Grumpy old man, in the posts you are citing from last night, talks about that debt of £20-25m, so you'd be wrong there, which just makes it a clean sweep.

Wrong about my identity being linked to any of those people (I mean you have seen my username on there)

Wrong about painting me as autistic (you seem to take great pleasure in this one)

Wrong about the £20m

So which bits can you stand by, given they're demonstrably wrong? You're a nasty old man with nothing better to do. I know @Gordon Armstrong got involved at the time because your compulsion to abuse me overrides common decency. I thought it was the right thing to do, but you standing by demonstrable lies and insults is a measure of who you are.
 
Hate it when threads turn to arguments etc. Let’s not turn this into threads like across the road. We all want the same outcome and that’s something positive for our club

I think this goes beyond that, look at the abuse he sends me and posts about.