Fans confronting or attacking players

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Yeah, just the same.

Players walks off the pitch and is subjected to dogs abuse by a supporter, then reacts.

Fan runs on pitch and punches a player during the game = the same.

[HASHTAG]#blameunuted[/HASHTAG].


A mate of mine was at that match. He’s a big Palace fan and ST holder. The guy Cantona twatted was a well known gobby troublemaker.

Apparently, according by to my mate, he ran down to where Cantona was and yelled ‘Go on, **** off back to France, you French ****” and then tried to spit at him...

The rest you know.

Not condoning what Cantona did, he obviously just snapped and went after the guy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chief
Does Nevlle really think fans are going to pay £50 to sit behind a ****ing fence?
Football on TV will look **** with no fans in the lower tier of grounds.
 
My point was that dickhead Gary Neville was making references to fencing, remember them, the very item that got football fans killed. But not only that he was calling for points deductions too, now regardless if Cantona was goaded, i don't remember United getting points deductions, so Neville needs to wind his neck in.

Cantona got an eight or ten month ban.

Fencing keeps fans at bay, not players.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Deleted.......
He was calling for points deductions, my point was I don't remember United getting points deductions.

Also anyone remember this dirty scouser....

You must log in or register to see media

If fences were a good idea (they're not but if they were) and Neville hadn't bothered to say the same before, it wouldn't change the fact we should have them would it? It would be on their own merits. They're not though and there are plenty of reasons why so Neville's wrong, the end.
 
  • Like
Reactions: haslam
Yep and court action imo. The unprovoked attack on Grealish should be a criminal case.

It's a criminal offence and will go to court;

Common Assault – s39 Criminal Justice Act 1988. An offence of Common Assault is committed when a person either assaults another person or commits a battery. An assault is committed when a person intentionally or recklessly causes another to apprehend the immediate infliction of unlawful force.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Treble
Neville is wrong in this instance about fences, but the reason has nothing to do with Cantona. Don't know why that's being brought into this.

Because, because... Man Utd should have a retrospective points deduction and the title should be awarded to Newcastle for that season!!!

The dodgy frenchman should cost his club dearly and bring long deserved glory to the magnificent Newcastle!!


What? That was the season before we finished 2nd? Man Utd were 2nd that season and Newcastle were 6th? Oh, forget it, should have kicked him harder.
 
Does Nevlle really think fans are going to pay £50 to sit behind a ****ing fence?
Football on TV will look **** with no fans in the lower tier of grounds.

I've sat behind them, even at a world cup game. ****ing awful, pissed me right off. Game went to pens and we were behind the goal and it was worse!
 
  • Like
Reactions: remembercolinlee
Because, because... Man Utd should have a retrospective points deduction and the title should be awarded to Newcastle for that season!!!

The dodgy frenchman should cost his club dearly and bring long deserved glory to the magnificent Newcastle!!


What? That was the season before we finished 2nd? Man Utd were 2nd that season and Newcastle were 6th? Oh, forget it, should have kicked him harder.

<laugh>
 
It's a criminal offence and will go to court;

Common Assault – s39 Criminal Justice Act 1988. An offence of Common Assault is committed when a person either assaults another person or commits a battery. An assault is committed when a person intentionally or recklessly causes another to apprehend the immediate infliction of unlawful force.

Attack on Grealish, didn't the guy actually touch him in some manner? In which case you'd be looking at Battery (which is probably the next bit of info after that quote there). It's the other part of common assault is when a person actually makes unlawful contact - you prosecute that because, among other reasons, it'll be easier to prove. They are both summary offences punishable up to 6 months and/or a fine in a magistrates.
 
  • Like
Reactions: brb
Cantona got an eight or ten month ban.

Fencing keeps fans at bay, not players.

Football fans get a five year ban at least. The point was Manchester United didn't get a points deduction.
 
Attack on Grealish, didn't the guy actually touch him in some manner? In which case you'd be looking at Battery (which is probably the next bit of info after that quote there). It's the other part of common assault is when a person actually makes unlawful contact - you prosecute that because, among other reasons, it'll be easier to prove. They are both summary offences punishable up to 6 months and/or a fine in a magistrates.

The Gills fan that got prosecuted for an identical offence, being a youth, got a nine month referral order and a five year ban.
 
I've sat behind them, even at a world cup game. ****ing awful, pissed me right off. Game went to pens and we were behind the goal and it was worse!
I remember standing behind them n he 1980s mainly at WHL, but also at Selhurst Park, The Valley and Loftus Road. Horrible things that spoilt the view...was the main reason I watch spurs from the top of the shelf ... a distant view was better than looking through metal squares.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Treble
The Gills fan that got prosecuted for an identical offence, being a youth, got a nine month referral order and a five year ban.

If it happened anywhere else then there's no real chance of imprisonment for a first offence. Given the fact it was watched by so many and there's been a recent spate of these types of things there's a possibility the magistrate may seek to make an example of the offender but it's not likely.

I'd expect a non-custodial but with strong conditions regarding future actions.
 
Oh, ok.

A United fan didn't run on the pitch and punch an opposition player though, so?

Hang on I see where he's going.

Cantona should have got a 5 year ban, meaning we simply have to discount his goal in the 1-0 victory against newcastle the following year, thus giving Newcastle the title retrospectively.

It's morally the correct thing to do. I'll write to the FA lads. Sorted.