OK folks, before it goes anywhere, let's keep suggestions of delusion out of the conversation. Ta. Keep it civil, even if you can't be sweet.
Apologies!OK folks, before it goes anywhere, let's keep suggestions of delusion out of the conversation. Ta. Keep it civil, even if you can't be sweet.
OK folks, before it goes anywhere, let's keep suggestions of delusion out of the conversation. Ta. Keep it civil, even if you can't be sweet.
Someone sent that Sotonians stuff to Adam Blackmore. He's had a read of it and here's his reply...
"that pretty much nails it for me - concurs with all I have, know & thought"
Well, not nice, even if factually accurate.What about Blackmore being called "a fat local hack"?
Can you remind me who your sources are?Yeah, he says that while Koeman was away on his first holiday we made contact with his former agent.
We were in talks with his former agent weeks before that. He also says that his agent refused the approach and that Koeman knew nothing about it. This is also cobblers, Koeman knew exactly what was being proposed.
Koeman sacked his agent before he went to the Caribbean on holiday. He also said that we'd been turned down by Emery by this point. We hadn't, we only went to Emery when Koeman had himself said no - about 10 days before his change of heart. He also says that we used Jansen, we didn't, we were using Mendes in our managerial search. It's full of inaccuracies which is one reason why I took it with a pinch.
It's not a 'version' it's the way it panned out.Your version makes less sense.
Why did Koeman say no and then change his mind?
Still awaiting confirmation on who your sources are seeing as you have little faith in ours?It's not a 'version' it's the way it panned out.
I think £6m a year might be the answer btw....
Put it this way, it wasn't someone I bumped into for a coffee who had some unknown connection with Soton.Still awaiting confirmation on who your sources are seeing as you have little faith in ours?
oh right. As long as it's from an impeccable source that clears it all up then!Put it this way, it wasn't someone I bumped into for a coffee who had some unknown connection with Soton.
The info I got on this issue was from an impeccable source (who's currently away on holiday btw, so I have no current information on the situation) and if you go back and read my posts on the subject from the point I joined this discussion weeks ago, you'll see that the timeline inaccuracies in the post from Jack **** cast doubt on the entire content.
oh right. As long as it's from an impeccable source that clears it all up then!
Exactly, his source is ofcourse several times more trustworthy than anything we could ever have to offer. Their sources are obviously massive for such a big club.oh right. As long as it's from an impeccable source that clears it all up then!
Koeman' s on holiday isn't he - surely you're not choosing to believe what he says?Put it this way, it wasn't someone I bumped into for a coffee who had some unknown connection with Soton.
The info I got on this issue was from an impeccable source (who's currently away on holiday btw, so I have no current information on the situation) and if you go back and read my posts on the subject from the point I joined this discussion weeks ago, you'll see that the timeline inaccuracies in the post from Jack **** cast doubt on the entire content.
Get a BBC journalist to publicly confirm your story, and I'll believe your source.Put it this way, it wasn't someone I bumped into for a coffee who had some unknown connection with Soton.