Off Topic EU deabte. Which way are you voting ?

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

How will you vote in the EU referendum ?

  • Total voters
    74
Status
Not open for further replies.
Has anyone even put a bid in for Mahrez, or is it common knowledge he's pretty **** without Kante winning the ball back and passing it to him?



I expect him to follow Kante to Chelsea now <laugh>
 
  • Like
Reactions: Spurlock
NowsufferinginSpain said:
Exactly! May isn't stupid. She knows how this is liable to pan out and she can justifiably claim that she put genuine Brexiters in position to negotiate and that's the best they could do.
Click to expand...

That about sums up how wrong you can possibly be.

Do you really believe she would deliberately sabotage her achievements in leading her party and holding the office of Prime Minister; do you really believe she is edging her bets? What a ****ing barmpot you are! <doh>
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: petersaxton
Fez said:
That about sums up how wrong you can possibly be.

Do you really believe she would deliberately sabotage her achievements in leading her party and holding the office of Prime Minister; do you really believe she is edging her bets? What a ****ing barn pot you are! <doh>
Click to expand...
He thinks everybody should be like Momentum which wants to drag the Labour Party away from any chance of power just so they can be really really left wing.
 
Skylarker said:
Without Kante, Mahrez wouldn't have even have got the ball.

Bye Bye Leicester. Back in your cave Fossy.
Click to expand...

:emoticon-0136-giggl :emoticon-0136-giggl Sky, Sky ... please do stop ... your meandering, mid-table, mutterings of doom and gloom towards the EPL Champions elect are causing such paroxysms of mirth down our way that some of us are in danger of cracking a rib or two ... and not of the kind that you consider to be the height of fine dining on your regular visits to your local Harvester. No Sky ... in all seriousness - if you have read above you will see that we already have a replacement in should N'Golo decide to move on ... what's more, unlike that time when 'Pool lost fans favourite, Slippy G, and replaced him with Milner-Scuffit (Jerk of all trades master of none ... and certainly not the All Black winger that many deluded 'Pool fans thought they were getting) ... our replacement has the potential to be even better ... plus we had gone 15 EPL games only losing one before N'Golo made his full debut ...
 
Fez said:
That about sums up how wrong you can possibly be.

Do you really believe she would deliberately sabotage her achievements in leading her party and holding the office of Prime Minister; do you really believe she is edging her bets? What a ****ing barn pot you are! <doh>
Click to expand...
It will be interesting.
Not sure what to make of this
http://uk.mobile.reuters.com/article/idUKKCN0ZU2QG
'Scotland's position could further delay divorce talks as, under devolution rules, the parliaments of Scotland, Northern Ireland and Wales are required to consent to any EU exit, according to a report by the House of Lords.'
I thought this had been disproved.
 
If anyone still has any doubts about the nature and competence of the EU, here's a pretty detailed (and okay, long) discussion between Noam Chomsky and the former Greek finance minister. They go into reasonable detail on the economics of the EU, who does what, why and how.
.

You must log in or register to see media
 
Tobes said:
the ace anyway, as we need the financial passports or our financial sector is up **** creek.
Click to expand...

This much repeated so-called fact about the financial passporting is inaccurate. There are ways around it, it was discussed and accepted much earlier on this thread. If some actions are taken it isn't an issue, if they are not it is. Only time will tell us which it is to be, but my money is on folks survival instincts (and greed) kicking in.
 
Fez said:
That about sums up how wrong you can possibly be.

Do you really believe she would deliberately sabotage her achievements in leading her party and holding the office of Prime Minister; do you really believe she is edging her bets? What a ****ing barmpot you are! <doh>
Click to expand...

You're the ****ing barmpot - whatever the **** that is - if you don't understand how politicians think and work.

And, I wouldn't normally do this, but in your case I'm delighted to make an exception - it's hedging - barmpot!...<ok>
 
NowsufferinginSpain said:
The need for you to continue making a twat of yourself, is even more unsurprising!....

I expect it now, it's sooooo predictable!...(<laugh>
Click to expand...

Your bragging is hilarious; as long as it keeps you happy I'm fully supportive of you making yourself look like the shallow, pompous fool you clearly are. <cheers>
 
PISKIE said:
So the head of the WTO doesn't know how the WTO works then ? You are missing the point of renegotiating the deals, as part of the EU we trade with those countries under deals negotiated with the EU, under WTO deals we could not 'copy and paste' those agreements, but would have to renegotiate each one separately. As for the time that would take, I'm not sure where you got the idea that I think those deals will be negotiated and concluded one by one, that seems to be some random baseless assumptions of yours. The point I am making is that according to the head of the WTO, those deals will be done based on the priorities of the countries that we are negotiating with, not just because we want them done 'quickly'. Once you factor in that our economy alone is worth vastly less to those countries that the EU single market, then as the US have said, we will drop to the back of the queue.

Regarding accessing the single market. It comes either by being a member state or paying a tariff. With those arrangements also comes free movement. If you think the UK is going to be given free access to the single market with no immigration obligations, then you are living in cloud cuckoo land.
Click to expand...

I can agree with much of what you say, but it lacks the perspective of competition for winning specific markets, which just might be one of the factors that may encourage early closure.

Too many absolutes, not enough imagination; there is always the possibility, if not the probability, that the EU will evolve and meet with internal pressures that will require them to re-think their own rules.

This is a period of huge change, don't keep taking the what has been as the what might be.
 
Fez said:
I can agree with much of what you say, but it lacks the perspective of competition for winning specific markets, which just might be one of the factors that may encourage early closure.

Too many absolutes, not enough imagination; there is always the possibility, if not the probability, that the EU will evolve and meet with internal pressures that will require them to re-think their own rules.

This is a period of huge change, don't keep taking the what has been as the what might be.
Click to expand...
There are a huge number of people who totally lack imagination. They dont understand things deeply enough to understand that things dont have to be done the same way they have in the past. It's like the old saying that some people have 40 years experience and other people have one years experience 40 times.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom
Back