The first part discusses the very real problem of fan displeasure having a negative effect on any sale opportunity. No one can deny this factor is important and worthy of more consideration. They want the sale, we want the sale, a way of making that happen is the responsibility of both sides - but both should have boundaries.
Perhaps the message can swing from 'Allams Out' to 'New Owners In'.
Perhaps embracing change to a foreign manager can be used to demonstrate a welcome to a foreign owner.
'Allam Out' has been the call and I think he has got the message; it's not the Allams we have to convince. There is an opportunity for change and it should be considered.
Regarding transfers he is as clear as he should be. Players who want away will go - at the right price. I can't see anything wrong with that.
He says there are more to come in, but to an agreed budget. I can't see anything wrong with that, either.
This is the most honest and revealing interview for a very long time, and certainly one that didn't attack the supporters, but simply said it as it is. Whether or not he accepts any blame is immaterial, what is important is that another opportunity isn't missed.
I can...and do
I don't think it (protests having a negative affect) is true
Not to say that I don't think that it's beneficial for everyone to try and encourage the sale, I just don't believe that protests negatively affect the sale. If anything I think they help because a new owner would know that they would be heralded as a better owner without even trying