ctwd now out in the open

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
i'll have to get back to you later on this one, dad. there are that many loonies blaming ctwd for stuff that is the chairman's fault on here that i can't remember what i've said to each one and why.

if it's any help, anyone who trots out the "he can do what he likes" line deserves much ire and is wrong, as are the ones who think ctwd are the antichrist, and anyone who doesn't object to the (dead in water) name change.

You're making yourself looking dafter than normal.

I have never said he can do what he wants. I have never criticised CTWD and I am openly against the name change.

I called you out for making an analogy involving kids being raped and off you went with your 'I'm a super fan and everyone else is beneath me ' diatribe.

Boring as ****.
 
You're making yourself looking dafter than normal.

I have never said he can do what he wants. I have never criticised CTWD and I am openly against the name change.

I called you out for making an analogy involving kids being raped and off you went with your 'I'm a super fan and everyone else is beneath me ' diatribe.

Boring as ****.

see, i told you i'd need to check what our difference of opinion was. nice of you to save me the bother. cheers, dad. glad to see you're generally on my side, even if you get a bit pompous over the occasional analogy now and then.
 
StrovolosTiger:7093997 said:
How could you know that if they are silent?

They weren't silent on Monday and if my guess is right they won't be silent at about the 20 minute mark at the Man City game.

You're probably right, but not today. Away games seem to be still be the domain of those who want to the support the team and defend its name. But the booers who only do home games are not any less of a fan than those who do every game and sing up, of course.
 
They weren't silent on Monday and if my guess is right they won't be silent at about the 20 minute mark at the Man City game.

The fact they'll only pipe up 20 minutes in to boo their own fans proves how pathetic they are. Really, really pathetic.

This is exactly why we think they are **** fans, and it's not just us being elitist, fans all over the country will agree.
 
The fact they'll only pipe up 20 minutes in to boo their own fans proves how pathetic they are. Really, really pathetic.

This is exactly why we think they are **** fans, and it's not just us being elitist, fans all over the country will agree.

Why do you say they only "pipe up" after 20 mins??? Surely you aren't trying to claim these fans don't shout or sing throughout the rest of the game?

These fans see the 1904 chant as a protest against the owner. It is that, that they are booing, and I am certain the players realise this as well. It is no more pathetic than the 1904 protest and it is happening at Newcastle today with the Geordies as well.
 
Why do you say they only "pipe up" after 20 mins??? Surely you aren't trying to claim these fans don't shout or sing throughout the rest of the game?

These fans see the 1904 chant as a protest against the owner. It is that, that they are booing, and I am certain the players realise this as well. It is no more pathetic than the 1904 protest and it is happening at Newcastle today with the Geordies as well.
The ****ers who sit around me and did the booing on Monday have hardly made a peep in all the years they've sat in West Upper. ****ing fannies.
 
Why do you say they only "pipe up" after 20 mins??? Surely you aren't trying to claim these fans don't shout or sing throughout the rest of the game?

These fans see the 1904 chant as a protest against the owner. It is that, that they are booing, and I am certain the players realise this as well. It is no more pathetic than the 1904 protest and it is happening at Newcastle today with the Geordies as well.

Surely you're playing devil's advocate? The people around me who never say a word all game were the only ones booing.
 
If they've hardly made a sound in 12 years, they must be really pissed off to start now.
Either that, or the fact that we've spent a ****load of money this summer means that - somehow - the proposed name change that they were the supposedly "silent" majority over, and that was supposed to have been put to bed until Allam called his preposterous press conference, now doesn't matter.

What a set of spineless ****s. Bought.
 
Why do you say they only "pipe up" after 20 mins??? Surely you aren't trying to claim these fans don't shout or sing throughout the rest of the game?

These fans see the 1904 chant as a protest against the owner. It is that, that they are booing, and I am certain the players realise this as well. It is no more pathetic than the 1904 protest and it is happening at Newcastle today with the Geordies as well.

A few behind me in East Stand booed, I never, ever hear them singing or chanting.
 
There were, as I have a;ready said, plenty of booos coming out of the South Stand where I sit and I can assure you it isn't quiet in the South Stand.

when i start my new company up, i shall offer you a job. seems like you'll put up with any old crap. i like that in a prospective employee.
 
And what did you say to those "f**ing fannies" sat around you?
That's right. f** all Keyboard Warrior.

While your post could (ironically) be accused of being one of a keyboard warrior, Polly calling them something behind their backs could not. Keyboard bitch, maybe, but not warrior (you need an opponent present for that).
 
So... In summary we're all allowed to spout guff like "Well, Allam said he wants us all to die", but the minute something like this gets brought up we find every excuse in the book to pardon them from it. Both quotes have been taken out of context yet only one continuously gets brought up by CTWD and their supporters. I'd say I was shocked and surprised, but I'm really not...

Double Standards

CTWDLogic
 
True colours and a bit of honesty. Well done.

https://mobile.twitter.com/INDEPENDENT_MG/status/455080832068501505

Ctwd Chairman 9th April 2014 CTWD - NO TO HULL TIGERS “**** you Allam. ****!”

The tweet underneath from his mate "brilliant! It's like one of your emails has been snooped on!


Now lets stop all the bullshit. Anti name change anti Allam always was.

I joined CTWD because I think we should remain as Hull City and I think don't think there is business case for the name change. I wasn't "anti-Allam" until he showed massive disrespect to me and others who feel the name and history and all it means was worth keeping. He showed his colours a long time before now. I couldn't give a flying **** if he sells tomorrow or Monday the sooner the better as far as I am concerned. Why? because he lost my respect the day he made his statement about the fans.
 
So... In summary we're all allowed to spout guff like "Well, Allam said he wants us all to die", but the minute something like this gets brought up we find every excuse in the book to pardon them from it. Both quotes have been taken out of context yet only one continuously gets brought up by CTWD and their supporters. I'd say I was shocked and surprised, but I'm really not...

Double Standards

CTWDLogic

No double standards. Both were poor attempts at jokes, although I found Assem Allam's slightly funnier. The pathetic thing is that opponents of CTWD think a poor joke is proof that we hated Assem Allam all along. Apart from a picture of a hip flask and a few tweets about it have you got any other evidence of our supposed hatred?