ctwd now out in the open

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Anyone who carries a hip flask that has an inscription calling someone else a c**t is a bit sad.

And an insecure c**t.


Unless it said Alec Salmon was a c**t.

That would be acceptable.

IMO.
 
Carmine Galante. said:
Anyone who carries a hip flask that has an inscription calling someone else a c**t is a bit sad.

And an insecure c**t.


Unless it said Alec Salmon was a c**t.

That would be acceptable.

IMO.
Click to expand...

whose alec salmon?

how hypocritical garmine
 
PLT said:
You said what they claim is all lies. Even if Gretton is totally anti-Allam, how does that mean CTWD are? All of CTWD's statements and actions have been supportive of the owner. The same owner who repeatedly lies, threatens and tells us all to **** off and leave the club for those who just care about good football. He doesn't deserve the respect he's been given by CTWD and the rest of the fans.
Click to expand...

Cos they're lying soft twat.
 
1MoreAgain said:
Not taking any sides here and do not wish to but in all fairness CTWD jumped very quickly on anything wrong Allam said and people continued to bring it up in arguments ,so what is the difference here to me this is just as bad and does show the character of this person to people who have not had anything to do with CTWD.
Click to expand...

Where have CTWD jumped unjustly on anything anyone has said? You can't really think Allam hasn't been given enough slack for his various outbursts?

Chazz Rheinhold said:
Cos they're lying soft twat.
Click to expand...

So they're lying because they're lying? Wonderful logic.

Even if true how would it be a bad thing? Putting personal views to one side in order to maintain a respectful campaign. I'd say that's admirable.
 
Quote Originally Posted by PLT View Post
You said what they claim is all lies. Even if Gretton is totally anti-Allam, how does that mean CTWD are? All of CTWD's statements and actions have been supportive of the owner. The same owner who repeatedly lies, threatens and tells us all to f** off and leave the club for those who just care about good football. He doesn't deserve the respect he's been given by CTWD and the rest of the fans.

You say all CTWD actions have been supportive of the owner yet CTWD Director says those things can you do both?,reason i ask is because you people on here have been saying the silent majority can't be supporters of Allam and the club how is that different.
 
PLT said:
You said what they claim is all lies. Even if Gretton is totally anti-Allam, how does that mean CTWD are? All of CTWD's statements and actions have been supportive of the owner. The same owner who repeatedly lies, threatens and tells us all to **** off and leave the club for those who just care about good football. He doesn't deserve the respect he's been given by CTWD and the rest of the fans.
Click to expand...

I dont want to get into the "die when they want debate" because to believe that was literal is just ridiculous and i like to believe we as people of hull are smarter than that.

As the leader of a group you have to act in a certain way, everything you say and do directly represents your groups beliefs whether you like it or not! This tweet is very disappointing.
 
1MoreAgain said:
Quote Originally Posted by PLT View Post
You said what they claim is all lies. Even if Gretton is totally anti-Allam, how does that mean CTWD are? All of CTWD's statements and actions have been supportive of the owner. The same owner who repeatedly lies, threatens and tells us all to f** off and leave the club for those who just care about good football. He doesn't deserve the respect he's been given by CTWD and the rest of the fans.

You say all CTWD actions have been supportive of the owner yet CTWD Director says those things can you do both?,reason i ask is because you people on here have been saying the silent majority can't be supporters of Allam and the club how is that different.
Click to expand...

I don't think anyone has said that. But anyway, supporting Allam over the club is not okay, particularly if you're going to stubbornly refuse to accept that someone who cares more about Hull City than Assem Allam is a better fan than them. Someone who hates Assem Allam (hypothetically; I have no idea what MG thinks, and according to the tweet he didn't write that anyway) ensuring he doesn't let it affect his work for a supporters group is better than okay. Not even comparable.

So can anyone back up that lying thing or are you just going to keep giving up on points when I question them and starting a new one?
 
brabs666 said:
I dont want to get into the "die when they want debate" because to believe that was literal is just ridiculous and i like to believe we as people of hull are smarter than that.

As the leader of a group you have to act in a certain way, everything you say and do directly represents your groups beliefs whether you like it or not! This tweet is very disappointing.
Click to expand...

Ah yes it was just a clever metaphor wasn't it. It's just the sort of thing owners say isn't it? Except all the others that aren't Assem Allam of course. But cos it's Allam yeah he'll have just been misquoted, that'll be it. He couldn't have just been losing his rag and having a go at everyone yet again for questioning another of his bizarre decisions.

Since it was you who made the lying point are you able to back that up? How have CTWD lied by being supportive of the ownership? I assume that's what you're referring to but you still haven't explained. Do you think it'd be better if they adopted the approach of the fans who booed on Monday night and just went all-out attack? Do you think that would help the situation? Personally I think the way they've handled things by being overly supportive of the owner who doesn't deserve it has earned them a lot of plaudits.
 
PLT said:
Where have CTWD jumped unjustly on anything anyone has said? You can't really think Allam hasn't been given enough slack for his various outbursts?
Click to expand...
When he said "die when they want" meaning they can sing that as long as they want, which was taken to mean "i hope they all die". Clearly not what was meant by that statement - duh
 
Also no one's answered the OSC thing. The OSC have some directors who are massively anti name change and some who are massively anti CTWD, so are they lying by putting out neutral statements? Or is it different rules for them cos we're not desperately looking for something wrong with them?
 
PLT said:
I don't think anyone has said that. But anyway, supporting Allam over the club is not okay, particularly if you're going to stubbornly refuse to accept that someone who cares more about Hull City than Assem Allam is a better fan than them. Someone who hates Assem Allam (hypothetically; I have no idea what MG thinks, and according to the tweet he didn't write that anyway) ensuring he doesn't let it affect his work for a supporters group is better than okay. Not even comparable.

So can anyone back up that lying thing or are you just going to keep giving up on points when I question them and starting a new one?
Click to expand...


tbf though as a chairman of a non anti allam group, it doesn't set a good standard when he's posting that, and im a ctwd member, but you can't deny that mate
 
I'm not going into details but there have been times in my life when I have had real grievances with people. Life changing issues I'm talking about.


If one of my mates bought me a hip flask with an inscription of 'xxxxx' is a **** in relation to one of those people I`d have been embarrassed for them and me. It would go straight in the bin, I certainly wouldn't be plastering photo's of it on Twitter, which is for c**ts so no surprise there I suppose.

It's small time and it's pathetic.

There is nothing to admire in it.

Grow up FFS.
 
Carmine Galante. said:
I'm not going into details but there have been times in my life when I have had real grievances with people. Life changing issues I'm talking about.


If one of my mates bought me a hip flask with an inscription of 'xxxxx is a c**x' in relation to one of those people I`d have been embarrassed for them and me. It would go straight in the bin, I certainly wouldn't be plastering photo's of it on Twitter, which is for c**ts so no surprise there I suppose.

It's small time and it's pathetic.

There is nothing to admire in it.

Grow up FFS.
Click to expand...

i agree in this instance to be fair
 
brabs666 said:
When he said "die when they want" meaning they can sing that as long as they want, which was taken to mean "i hope they all die". Clearly not what was meant by that statement - duh
Click to expand...

Ah yes of course.

He told the fans to die when they want because he meant keep singing that song. That's just a normal way of saying it.

Sorry, but like I said, it was just another of his many outbursts against the fans because he hates nothing more than being questioned. He's a dictator and can't stand being told no so he just loses his **** and says things like that. It's hardly out of character is it?
 
Chazz Rheinhold said:
Cos they're lying soft twat.
Click to expand...

I know you called me a liar with nothing to back it up.

Someone bought Mark a hip flask to celebrate the FA saying no. It's clear it appealed to his sense of humour and he posted it on Twitter together with thousands of other messages. After 18 months of campaigning all you can point to is a couple of tweets about a present given to him in the days immediately after the FA decision.

Don't you think that really is a bit pathetic?

Have you used language like that?
 
there is probably a fair bit of damage done to CTWD from this incident wether you think there will be or not.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back