ctwd now out in the open

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Wait... have you just been looking through months worth of tweets from members of CTWDs twitter accounts?


Oh dear.
 
He's not just anyone. He's their new chairman.

You're gonna be a **** journo.

Thanks Mystic Meg <ok>


Someone might want to take note with the fact someone bought him it before making assumptions... but that would get in the way of a good story.



Of course, some on here seem to think if one person involved with CTWD has a different opinion from the agenda clearly stated time and time again but ignored by the idiots, that everyone else involved with CTWD has that opinion too.
 
It says someone bought him it.

Chazz have you ever met Mark Gretton? That's the kind of thing I might say but I don't think he would. He's much more subtle and calm. He always seems to me to be very careful about the exact wording of what he says and isn't the sort to just blurt something he'd regret. That's just the impression I've got from meeting him a couple of times. I couldn't say if he is personally anti-Allam or not as I don't know him that well but he isn't CTWD just as OLM or anyone else isn't when they post their individual views. If he is anti-Allam it doesn't stop CTWD from not being. Even if every one of them is anti-Allam the fact they keep supporting him shows the organisation is not. How can an organisation be judged on anything other than their actions and words? By the same flawed logic the OSC are much more anti-Allam.

I'm not sure it's a good thing that they aren't anti-Allam but can see why they take that stance and I'm happy enough with it as a member who trusts them. They're nothing if not honest and genuine.

I do find it surprising that he would tweet that picture though.
 
It says someone bought him it.

Chazz have you ever met Mark Gretton? That's the kind of thing I might say but I don't think he would. He's much more subtle and calm. I couldn't say if he is personally anti-Allam or not as I don't know him that well but he isn't CTWD just as OLM or anyone else isn't when they post their individual views. If he is anti-Allam it doesn't stop CTWD from not being. Even if every one of them is anti-Allam the fact they keep supporting him shows the organisation is not. How can an organisation be judged on anything other than their actions and words? By the same flawed logic the OSC are much more anti-Allam.

I'm not sure it's a good thing that they aren't anti-Allam but can see why they take that stance and I'm happy enough with it as a member who trusts them. They're nothing if not honest and genuine.

You have got to be kidding me. That inscription was clearly something that would appeal to him, and something he really clearly thought was OK. He's well chuffed with it in fact.

I don't get it.

Dr Allam says people can die when they want to, which is fine, if taken as he meant it. That gets twisted to him telling the hooligans to die now. That inscription is not in the slightest bit ambiguous nor is his reaction to it, and....you defend him and say the organisation he now is chairman of, isn't ant Allam, which he quite CLEARLY is.

You really couldn't make this up.
 
How does it?
If the chairmen of a group posts an image of suggesting that the opposing chairman is a c**t, not in ink or pencil but engraved- it would suggest that they are anti that person (Allam), dispite what the outwardly claim.
 
You have got to be kidding me. That inscription was clearly something that would appeal to him, and something he really clearly thought was OK. He's well chuffed with it in fact.

I don't get it.

Dr Allam says people can die when they want to, which is fine, if taken as he meant it. That gets twisted to him telling the hooligans to die now. That inscription is not in the slightest bit ambiguous nor is his reaction to it, and....you defend him and say the organisation he now is chairman of, isn't ant Allam, which he quite CLEARLY is.

You really couldn't make this up.

Usual noise.

I could spend time repeating everything I've just said once and which you haven't addressed at all, but it's still there for you to read more carefully.

Instead I'll cut to the chase, do you think the OSC are an anti-name change organisation? Are you outraged at them too? Or is it different because you don't have a bias against them?

CTWD, like the OSC or any other group, can only be judged upon its actions and statements, not one of its directors. If he's massively anti-Allam like me and is prepared to put that to one side in his CTWD capacity for the good of the group and its campaign then well done him.
 
If the chairmen of a group posts an image of suggesting that the opposing chairman is a c**t, not in ink or pencil but engraved- it would suggest that they are anti that person (Allam), dispite what the outwardly claim.

You said what they claim is all lies. Even if Gretton is totally anti-Allam, how does that mean CTWD are? All of CTWD's statements and actions have been supportive of the owner. The same owner who repeatedly lies, threatens and tells us all to **** off and leave the club for those who just care about good football. He doesn't deserve the respect he's been given by CTWD and the rest of the fans.
 
Not taking any sides here and do not wish to but in all fairness CTWD jumped very quickly on anything wrong Allam said and people continued to bring it up in arguments ,so what is the difference here to me this is just as bad and does show the character of this person to people who have not had anything to do with CTWD.