Coronavirus

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Boris...

  • should completely lock us down immediately and fook up all our Christmas'

    Votes: 3 12.5%

  • let the bodies stack high

    Votes: 13 54.2%

  • lock us down from the 29th to fook up Treble's plans

    Votes: 8 33.3%
  • Total voters
    24
Status
Not open for further replies.
Tobes said:
The discussion was about the quarantine scheme that came into force today, I assumed you were referring to that.

When it seems you were referring to that discussion about infection rates, and are now using data released a week later and are claiming to be correct about something. Right oh.
Click to expand...

The discussion which yapping lapdog decided to bring back up was this figure posted by LL last week of 10000s infection a day.

He proved that by quoting a figure of 5600 a day, weirdly.

You argued merrily last week that I was wrong in saying there wasn't an infection rate of 10000 a day last week, by showing ONS stats from three weeks prior.

I've just posted last week's actual stats.

I wasn't in a discussion about quarantine schemes.

Happy to end this one now as it goes, cheers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tiddler and Diego
Chief said:
The discussion which yapping lapdog decided to bring back up was this figure posted by LL last week of 10000s infection a day.

He proved that by quoting a figure of 5600 a day, weirdly.

You argued merrily last week that I was wrong in saying there wasn't an infection rate of 10000 a day last week, by showing ONS stats from three weeks prior.

I've just posted last week's actual stats.

I wasn't in a discussion about quarantine schemes.

Happy to end this one now as it goes, cheers.
Click to expand...

You mean the one where you ignored the fact that LL clearly said between 5-10,000 infections per day, and I quoted the latest ONS report from that week (and the discussion was on the 3rd not the 5th) that showed an estimated figure of 54,000 per week for England and the not the entire U.K., that one?

Right oh.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ivan Dobsky
pompeymeowth said:
I was in Southsea the other day, the pubs down Pslmerston road there, are putting big tables outside the door and serving drinks off it, that were poured out behind the bar.

Loads of people standing around beering it up, obvs.
Click to expand...


The landlady of our local did that over the BH weekend, but someone inevitably grassed her up. Even though she thought she was acting within guidelines, she knocked it on the head for now, because she didn’t want trouble with the neighbours.
 
Tobes said:
You mean the one where you ignored the fact that LL clearly said between 5-10,000 infections per day, and I quoted the latest ONS report from that week (and the discussion was on the 3rd not the 5th) that showed an estimated figure of 54,000 per week for England and the not the entire U.K., that one?

Right oh.
Click to expand...

June 3rd is last week.

I posted a link to ONS figures from last week above.

You posted figures from May. Yes, that one.

<ok>
 
Chief said:
It wasn't, you said 7-10,000 day currently, last week.
Click to expand...

Hmmm...
Looney Leftie said:
Lets be honest, our lockdown was piss poor compared to other countries. The delay and failure to mandate masks are the two that stand out most.

If it's true we are still at 5-10,000 infections per day then the tracing procedures have no chance of keeping up with the spread. The numbers need to be in the hundreds before some form of normality can safely resume.
Click to expand...
 
Correct, sorry it was someone else said between 7 and 9 thousand a day.

Also fully admit 39000 in a week is between 5 and 10000. It's also between 5 and 6000.

Wouldn't be surprised if that's now rising steadily after this last weekend.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Diego and Looney Leftie
Chief said:
June 3rd is last week.

I posted a link to ONS figures from last week above.

You posted figures from May. Yes, that one.

<ok>
Click to expand...
No, the discussion was last week, you were provided with the latest figures published that week, and you were wrong, simple as.

You’ve now felt the need to revisit it this week, using figures published this week, and somehow retrospectively applied them to your argument. Genius.

You’ve also missed out the bit when you tried claiming there wasn’t 10,000 cases per week, realised it was bollocks and edited your post.

****ing pathetic tbh.
 
Last week I was using figures that I said were from the tracer app I log data into. I said as much.

You used ONS, I didn't. I've published this weeks ONS figure as they corroborate more what I said last week, as in last weeks rate of infection and how many people were deemed to be infected. I immediately edited the typo, which you refused to believe.

Nothing pathetic about it at all. I said fewer than 100000, the ONS data from last week agrees with that.
The data from May might not but then it wasn't me quoting that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tiddler
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom
Back