The main thing I took from Heneghan today was the amplification of the pcr test. I knew already that the test, as being used is purely qualitative, either positive or negative. He said though that it can be used to distinguish between dead and alive viral RNA (I know dead and alive are not the correct terms), and therefore those who are infectious or not.Good call mate. I should respond in kind, I find some of this stuff very frustrating and sometimes post without due care and attention. Apologies.
I also said in one of my responses that all the measures taken should be explained in terms of risk/benefit, so we can all understand what is expected to be gained at what cost. But then, as people can’t understand a simple message like ‘don’t panic buy, there is plenty in the supply chain’, what’s the point?
Partly the frustration is due to exactly what you are saying - there is no debate, just ‘I’m right and everyone else is wrong’ from both sides, although the pro lockdown side just don’t acknowledge the counter arguments at all from what I can see. At least Heneghan and his pal Jefferson have put forward an alternative strategy and admit that differing interpretations of unclear statistics are at the root of the divisions. Gupta I’m afraid is the one who modelled 5000 deaths in spring and said we had reached herd immunity in September. I don’t know what drives her.
These are crucial details.

that we should have shut our borders.