Off Topic Climate Change
- Thread starter Looney Leftie
- Start date
- Status
So they are just doing it for the money
yes, you claimed that big oil is conspiring against climate for money.
Now you are saying they are not getting into far more profitable renewable.. for money
So in a matter of 4 posts you claim that big oil is denying climate for money AND supporting climate but not for money.
Did you bang your head or are you drinking?
@PISKIE You're on a fishing expedition you ****
I do not believe for one second you are that stupid! Not when there has never been evidence as far as I am aware, that you are that stupid.
I haven't been following this thread, I'll have to have a proper read and see how much of a mad **** you actually are first.
I knew it you bastard !
@PISKIE You're on a fishing expedition you ****
I do not believe for one second you are that stupid! Not when there has never been evidence as far as I am aware, that you are that stupid.
****ing hell, you're showing a lot of limitations in your research there.
Careful, once pulled in, it's hard to get out of the ****e
Yeah I'm never sure whether to give these threads the time they need. If you're dealing with somebody who's open to listening to a view that doesn't support their own, it's sometimes worth it. But if you're dealing with a subscriber to shape shifting interdimensional lizards who have infiltrated the Royal Family, then it's probably best to just go and do the washing up instead.
Let me add my bit good man
Co2 gas has been used in welding for many years, it was always called Co2 wire welding that later went to MIG welding. Co2 is the shielding gas that protects the weld from incoming Oxygen, Nitrogen and Hydrogen that is in the atmosphere. It can cut gases coming in and out through it's solid mass. Co2 is a very cold gas and often gets called dry ice, usually with temps below -78 degrees c..
Co2 I believe can, barrier warm air going out and cool air coming in the stratos which may be adding to our crazy climate..
Just my opinion of course..
CO2 is only a cold gas if it has been pressurised and cooled.
But you make an excellent point that CO2 absorbs energy in the infra red.
I'm afraid phddee has thrown everything from tampered reports, fake news articles and unreachable web pages at me in his pursuit of 'the truth'. You'll also notice how every post has to end with an insult to boost his ego.
It's why there is so little point in genuine engagement
Quick question, if CO2 is so important why can unused carbon credits be sold?
Surely every credit not used should be a bonus to the climate.
that's because the carbon credit scam is obviously a scam.
It's a system of wealth redistribution.
Rich nations buy up credit from poor nations, and rich nations keep producing and the corrupt govs of banana republics just pocket the credit cash.
It has nothing to do with environment or climate Diego, it never had.
You must log in or register to see images
You must log in or register to see images
Neither of the two above images are dishonest or untrue, they both have said these things, Figueres constantly blabbed about destroying capitalism
History,, Lysenkoism was communist science that demanded nature conform to the proletariat. Millions died.
Now we have communists again, going after the best economic system the planet has ever had, that has lifted more out of poverty than any other system ever by a MASSIVE Margin
There are far worse environmental threats than CO2, or AGW, and they get almost no attention.
Every year most of the CO2 is consumed/aborbed and only 3% to 5% of that yearly cycle is our emissions.
You must log in or register to see images
****ing junk science.
In 10 years not one person has ever been able to give me any evidence, none, including Loony lefty there as well.
They cant even tell you how much is human caused change and how much is natural.
Land changes have infinitely more impact than CO2 ever will. Fact
In fact China's land changes have caused warming that would overwhelm any possible Co2 signal for example.
All US warming is in minimum temps, as in the coldest weather is getting not as cold, slowly.
IF AGW was valid both MIN and MAX temps would be increasing but they arent
US max temps have declined since the 1930s and the UK.. lol its hottest century is still the 1700s
These liars will leave out these things, because it doesn't compute
"Climate change" is bollocks, climate will always change no matter what, AGW is a theory without evidence
Last edited:
Why is it that reverse image searches on these sorts of discussions always end up on some really weird sites?
Why is it that you are talking about images instead of salient points.
but to smash your conspiracy theory, here is a scr shot
You must log in or register to see images
I copy paste what image I am looking for from here.
I dont visit the sites
I see you never came back, re New York Times fake temperature data
because I was correct. They only use data back to 1960 to hide the fact that the US was warmer before the 60seven the new Climate report from the WH confirms this to be true, NYT climate news is fake news
Why is it that you are talking about images instead of salient points.
but to smash your conspiracy theory, here is a scr shot
You must log in or register to see images
I copy paste what image I am looking for from here.
I dont visit the sites
I see you never came back, re New York Times fake temperature data
even the new Climate report from the WH confirms this to be true, NYT climate news is fake news
Image searching for something to back up your view is also pretty ****ty research.
- Status