Off Topic Climate Change

Status
Not open for further replies.
Tobes said:
Didn’t read ^
Click to expand...


<laugh> Add coward into that too <laugh>

Spineless fat unlovable, childless, talentless lying pathetic loner who spends all day every day on a football forum for his social life

You really are a pile of human feces
 
  • Like
Reactions: DMD
PhheHdee said:
<laugh> Add coward into that too <laugh>

Spineless fat unlovable, childless, talentless lying pathetic loner who spends all day every day on a football forum for his social life

You really are a pile of human feces
Click to expand...

I’m none of those things I’m afraid, so your sad little fantasy fails again.

Go ask your Mrs if you can borrow your own bollocks, you emasculated freak.

You’re an intellectual lightweight, who’s so insuecure about that fact, that he’s gone to Uni in his 40’s and insults anyone who holds a different view to him, trying to decry their intelligence. You’re as transparent as tissue paper.
 
DerekTheMole said:
I've argued this to death in your past life as Sisu and it's impossible to discuss anything with you without you flying off the handle. Nowadays I like posts. Partially because I agree with them but mostly because it riles you right up. Same effect but less effort.

Edit. I should add that it's hilarious that you bring @Diego into this. His inability to research things for himself is legendary.
Click to expand...


Except its not true. I clearly started on this thread discussing what evidence there is and debunking claims with counter arguments.

Some of the others, looney and Tobes dont like the counter arguments and talk about me personally, because that is their level, and I oblige.
This round of nonsense started over me debunking spurious media reports, and the lads got offended by that.

You need to cherry pick comments to make the claim you make here.

Flying off the handle, is your perception, I'm always calm, if abusive :D Any time you've made a reasonable argument I responded in kind, and I can demonstrate that with quotes <ok>


Several requests for evidence go unanswered and instead posts about me personally and little like circle jerks are the result. Here you are not posting evidence and talking about me <ok> Interesting that you even point it out.

Crying about me tagging Diego, lol. He's pragmatic and is evidence based, this thread needs one sane person to see the utter blendery in the responses to me.

Remove all of the belligerent posts on this thread, and you are left with posts from looney that are not evidence for AGW, and Tobes calling me oil shill (because that was his default when I was not belligerent and he didn't like the facts as they stood) , and me debunking bogus claims that have no real evidence to support them.

Allegedly 97% of scientists agree (a lie).. so there should be so much actual evidence, that no counter argument is possible.

Oh btw, you never confirmed whether I was right or not about NYT pushing climate propaganda with their fake temperature data set, I mention this because you engaged, and I assume you checked? They are, the NYT fake temperature data sets are not actual temperature data sets at all.
 
Last edited:
PhheHdee said:
Except its not true. I clearly started on this thread discussing what evidence there is and debunking claims with counter arguments.

Some of the others, looney and Tobes dont like the counter arguments and talk about me personally, because that is their level, and I oblige.
This round of nonsense started over me debunking spurious media reports, and the lads got offended by that.

You need to cherry pick comments to make the claim you make here.

Flying off the handle, is your perception, I'm always calm, if abusive :D Any time you've made a reasonable argument I responded in kind, and I can demonstrate that with quotes <ok>


Several requests for evidence go unanswered and instead posts about me personally and little like circle jerks are the result. Here you are not posting evidence and talking about me <ok> Interesting that you even point it out.

Crying about me tagging Diego, lol. He's pragmatic and is evidence based, this thread needs one sane person to see the utter blendery in the responses to me.

Remove all of the belligerent posts on this thread, and you are left with posts from looney that are not evidence for AGW, and Tobes calling me oil shill (because that was his default when I was not belligerent and he didn't like the facts as they stood) , and me debunking bogus claims that have no real evidence to support them.

Allegedly 97% of scientists agree (a lie).. so there should be so much actual evidence, that no counter argument is possible.

Oh btw, you never confirmed whether I was right or not about NYT pushing climate propaganda with their fake temperature data set, I mention this because you engaged, and I assume you checked? They are, the NYT fake temperature data sets are not actual temperature data sets at all.
Click to expand...
Speaking as a neutral who stumbled onto this thread... you come across as an arrogant, argumentative, aggressive tool. You might have all the facts in the world but when you write posts the way you do, everyone will ridicule and ignore what you say.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NSIS, Quesadaad, pieguts and 3 others
Stan said:
I take it Sisu is sticking to his strategy of hurling personal abuse at anyone who picks apart his arguments. It's the strategy of a true intellect.
Click to expand...
Well he's certainly coming across as a complete knobhead.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom
Back