Off Topic Climate change/ pollution

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Adding potentially dangerous chemicals which Bill Gates is investing in that could end up in our food chain, marketing it as saving the planet and our ARLA milk is better for the environment than other brands.

ARLA is doing trails with the methane reducing drug in animal feed, although unless they are catching all the cows emissions at both ends from those fed with and without the additive (which they are not) it's nothing more than a theoretical questimate.

A fair amount of the 'data' used to promote these things wouldn't be of a standard to pass an O level. They do not follow the scientific process, and often don't seem to realise their own limitations.
 
A fair amount of the 'data' used to promote these things wouldn't be of a standard to pass an O level. They do not follow the scientific process, and often don't seem to realise their own limitations.

Just spent 1/2 an hour on a farming forum reading about bovaer and they are not happy. A natural food produced sustainably now being tainted with added chemicals in a forlorn drive to net zero
 
A fair amount of the 'data' used to promote these things wouldn't be of a standard to pass an O level. They do not follow the scientific process, and often don't seem to realise their own limitations.

I have absolutely no stake in this milk argument, but you must've posted a variant of this a hundred times over the years on different subjects and about different scientists or experts. I'm not sure any one person could ever be qualified and aware enough to confidently dismiss the findings of as many scientists as you do.
 
I have absolutely no stake in this milk argument, but you must've posted a variant of this a hundred times over the years on different subjects and about different scientists or experts. I'm not sure any one person could ever be qualified and aware enough to confidently dismiss the findings of as many scientists as you do.

I know enough to spot poor science and poor use of data, and I'm certainly qualified and experienced enough to do that.
 
I have absolutely no stake in this milk argument, but you must've posted a variant of this a hundred times over the years on different subjects and about different scientists or experts. I'm not sure any one person could ever be qualified and aware enough to confidently dismiss the findings of as many scientists as you do.

The farmers are rightly concerned and there are plenty questioning the testing in here if you're interested.

https://www.thefarmingforum.co.uk/index.php?threads/bovaer.419009/
 
Nice storm coming this weekend.

I see the met office has put out a danger to life. They probably consider someone running a bath worthy of a red weather warning.
****,if it's that dangerous to run a bath I'm not taking the chance...

(Ric,shouting the Mrs to put some Epsom Salts in it).
 
  • Like
Reactions: TwoWrights
Which reminds me of a poster on Amber Nectar who used to post a blow by blow account, ahem, of his weekend trip(s) to London. Funny as ****.

Nobody on here I assume?
 
  • Like
Reactions: TwoWrights