If we earmarked a £9m spend we'd also "earmark" a massive rise in revenue.There's no "could possibly" about it - the total they are asking, so we are led to believe, is £9 million. Just not all at once. If you were buying him with your money you would have to earmark a £9 million spend.
I assumed that was a joke.Build the team around Meyler? Seriously? Although I quite like Meyler he's one of the most consistent members of the squad. He's definitely not the type of player to build a team around.
Us highjacking any deal sounds quite funny giving how we seem to mess about.Henri Lansbury if Tom goes? Apparently close to joining Burnley but we could try and hijack it
If it was there wasn't much comedy value.I assumed that was a joke.
Certainly don't want to be left with Meyler.
38 games isn't that long.
Plus his clock is ticking; he's already 25, his ability will have stopped progressing and his stats will begin to drop.
You must log in or register to see media
Happy days, if it happens.
Both Hudd and Jelavic no doubt have release clauses. Can see the club willing to sell Huddlestone with only a year left in his contract. Will be a big loss though, and very difficult to replace[/QUOTE]
Agreed, but if we try really, really hard we will find someone as consistently inconsistent.