City transfer thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
There's no "could possibly" about it - the total they are asking, so we are led to believe, is £9 million. Just not all at once. If you were buying him with your money you would have to earmark a £9 million spend.
If we earmarked a £9m spend we'd also "earmark" a massive rise in revenue.
 
It would be nice to think if we sell Hudd & Diame we could potentially end up with a better midfield.. if Bruce brings in the best possible replacements... like a Lansbury or Jota partnership... but we'll probably end up with palacious and meyler...
 
Both Hudd and Jelavic no doubt have release clauses. Can see the club willing to sell Huddlestone with only a year left in his contract. Will be a big loss though, and very difficult to replace[/QUOTE]

Agreed, but if we try really, really hard we will find someone as consistently inconsistent.
 
If I had any say in a release clause at a club for a player I would want to write in the release clause expires early in each transfer window. It's madness that a player can announce he's leaving in the last day of the window.