City transfer thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Mr. Shoes said:
I think we though Hernandez would be gone and I am pretty sure we need to shift another striker before we commit to another contract.

I can't see it being about the small change now.

I think we have lost out on the Italian clubs choking on the 9 million euros fee.when we started bidding he looked a goner and I reckon it's more significant that some think.
Click to expand...
Although I'd rather him gone and Gray in I think that he could do a job at this level.
 
I'm not convinced City currently have the firepower to convert enough chances that will come our way. This lad from Brentford might be the final peice of the jigsaw or another waste of wonga. It's Bruce's call,he ****ed up big style last season in my book,taking the club back up again would make the club look better in the shop window and attract any would be be buyers.


Appleton OUT.
 
  • Like
Reactions: petersaxton
EPT Sports said:
It is only £7m though, it could possibly rise to £9m but the original fee definitely isn't £9m
Click to expand...
There's no "could possibly" about it - the total they are asking, so we are led to believe, is £9 million. Just not all at once. If you were buying him with your money you would have to earmark a £9 million spend.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SydneyTiger14
Irememberwaggy said:
There's no "could possibly" about it - the total they are asking, so we are led to believe, is £9 million. Just not all at once. If you were buying him with your money you would have to earmark a £9 million spend.
Click to expand...

No, it's potential. £7m is guaranteed and then there are add ons which may or may not have to be paid. I very much doubt that Proschwitz cost the reported £2.6m nor did Ince cost the previous reported £2.2m. Clubs like to inflate figures so that it pleases fans
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fez
EPT Sports said:
No, it's potential. £7m is guaranteed and then there are add ons which may or may not have to be paid. I very much doubt that Proschwitz cost the reported £2.6m nor did Ince cost the previous reported £2.2m. Clubs like to inflate figures so that it pleases fans
Click to expand...

The 2.2m was set by a Tribunal, so I'm very sure Ince cost 2.2m.
 
Irememberwaggy said:
There's no "could possibly" about it - the total they are asking, so we are led to believe, is £9 million. Just not all at once. If you were buying him with your money you would have to earmark a £9 million spend.
Click to expand...

If we get promoted and trigger the £2m in add-on's, well have an additional £60m to take it from, we don't have to earmark anything.
 
originallambrettaman said:
It wasn't set by tribunal, we agreed the fee with Blackpool and we paid £1.6m, the rest was add-on's that we never triggered.
Click to expand...

<doh> So that tribunal hearing and the setting of a mandated fee we had to pay Blackpool that was only settled about six months after we bought him was unneccessary because we'd already agreed a fee?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back