I personally think it's worrying. I have slept with drunk girls and I have been totally smashed as well. I may write up a contract for them to sign 


I personally think it's worrying. I have slept with drunk girls and I have been totally smashed as well. I may write up a contract for them to sign![]()
Thing is you went off with the drunk girl so it's seen as consent. Evans just turned up with the girl naked and passed out and had his way.
That's so obviously rape, I wonder why they even bothered with a trial.
Just saying what was in the report, that's why the other guy got off. As she went to the hotel room with him. Ched turned up later watched a lil then took over when she was out off it.
Some one even filmed it on their mobile, think it was Ched's brother maybe wrong tho. Maybe the video was the evidence that convicted him?.
He filmed his brother noshing some unconscious chick? Strange family

****ing wrong'n ****. I hope he gets raped in prison, serves these stupid footballers right thinking they can do whatever they want in there little bubbles. The justice system is ****ing **** but thats an argument for another thread.

Where do you drink after the games? You need a slap, hiding behind a keyboard stating this kind of ****.
I do think it's abit weird that he got 5 years when the girl was too drunk to even remember where she was in the morning, They say her drink might of been spiked but they cant say her drink was actually spiked. Meaning she most probably was really drunk, i dont know what went on in the room but she cant remember anything surely that isn't reliable enough to sentence him? I think there's more to it tbh, I could be wrong. And if i am then he deserves more than 5 years.
i must be wrong but from what i read on it didnt really sound like 'rape'. it was saying that ched asks if he could get involved and she said yes so they went at it. obviously there must be some evidence to suggest other wise but from what i read on the bbc it didnt sound like rape. unless i missread it
I do think it's abit weird that he got 5 years when the girl was too drunk to even remember where she was in the morning, They say her drink might of been spiked but they cant say her drink was actually spiked. Meaning she most probably was really drunk, i dont know what went on in the room but she cant remember anything surely that isn't reliable enough to sentence him? I think there's more to it tbh, I could be wrong. And if i am then he deserves more than 5 years.