Time for a tax on ****s wasting most of their working day on football forums. Costing the country a ****in fortune they are.

Really?
Well whats so ****ing important about my smoking that you keep needing to bring it up then.
Because you mentioned that I try having no money for electricity? My main point was that you're not in poverty, your life doesn't sound so bad to me.
The prestige that comes with wealth is a zero-sum game and people are only happy if they are perceived to be wealthier than their neighbours (and people who are poorer than their neighbours are pissed off), if we gave every person in Britain a yacht tomorrow we'd have the Guardian bitching that 1/5th people are able to afford bigger yachts. So the process of getting richer is an arms race - having bigger and bigger houses, with flasher and flasher cars will lead to your neighbours doing the same, or being angry at their lack of good luck in not being able to do the same. The happiness derived from money is therefore subject to diminishing returns.
The welfare state helps propel this ridiculous keeping-up-with-the-Jones culture by moving relative poverty away from food and housing, to designer clothes and Sky TV. Who cares if you don't have Sky TV if you are perfectly healthy and have good wits about you?
Move the money from unnecessary benefits (such as working family tax credits etc) to services that actually make people happy.
Because you mentioned that I try having no money for electricity? My main point was that you're not in poverty, your life doesn't sound so bad to me.
The prestige that comes with wealth is a zero-sum game and people are only happy if they are perceived to be wealthier than their neighbours (and people who are poorer than their neighbours are pissed off), if we gave every person in Britain a yacht tomorrow we'd have the Guardian bitching that 1/5th people are able to afford bigger yachts. So the process of getting richer is an arms race - having bigger and bigger houses, with flasher and flasher cars will lead to your neighbours doing the same, or being angry at their lack of good luck in not being able to do the same. The happiness derived from money is therefore subject to diminishing returns.
The welfare state helps propel this ridiculous keeping-up-with-the-Jones culture by moving relative poverty away from food and housing, to designer clothes and Sky TV. Who cares if you don't have Sky TV if you are perfectly healthy and have good wits about you?
Move the money from unnecessary benefits (such as working family tax credits etc) to services that actually make people happy.
1- MD is not on benefits, as he repeatedly told you. He has 'other' means of income <maleprostitute>
2- If you honestly think that then you're an idiot
3- Yep, you definitely are an idiot
1. I never mentioned benefits.
2-3. Do you agree or disagree that in Britain the average working class person's standard of living is greater than that of the upper-middle class of 1913? (cars, health, sky, education, Argos catalogue full of 10,000 things everyone can afford, and are useless ****e).
I'd imagine that working family tax credits actually make the recipients very happy. Good luck to them.
Maybe not if their child was born with cerebral palsy because their missus was stuck giving birth on a trolley for 12 hours due to a lack of hospital beds and doctors.
So because of paying out benefits the NHS is cutting back on staff and beds? Right oh.
Because you mentioned that I try having no money for electricity? My main point was that you're not in poverty, your life doesn't sound so bad to me.
The prestige that comes with wealth is a zero-sum game and people are only happy if they are perceived to be wealthier than their neighbours (and people who are poorer than their neighbours are pissed off), if we gave every person in Britain a yacht tomorrow we'd have the Guardian bitching that 1/5th people are able to afford bigger yachts. So the process of getting richer is an arms race - having bigger and bigger houses, with flasher and flasher cars will lead to your neighbours doing the same, or being angry at their lack of good luck in not being able to do the same. The happiness derived from money is therefore subject to diminishing returns.
The welfare state helps propel this ridiculous keeping-up-with-the-Jones culture by moving relative poverty away from food and housing, to designer clothes and Sky TV. Who cares if you don't have Sky TV if you are perfectly healthy and have good wits about you?
Move the money from unnecessary benefits (such as working family tax credits etc) to services that actually make people happy.
So because of paying out benefits the NHS is cutting back on staff and beds? Right oh.
Everyone doesn't get to win.
http://static.guim.co.uk/sys-images...32343666628/Budget-2012-tax-and-spend-001.jpg
1. I never mentioned benefits.
2-3. Do you agree or disagree that in Britain the average working class person's standard of living is greater than that of the upper-middle class of 1913? (cars, health, sky, education, Argos catalogue full of 10,000 things everyone can afford, and are useless ****e).

No Mick they don't all get to win but the money going on some of these benefits can be just as easily be saved somewhere else rather than the NHS - you more or less said that hospitals were cutting back because of people getting benefits which simply is not the case

No Mick they don't all get to win but the money going on some of these benefits can be just as easily be saved somewhere else rather than the NHS - you more or less said that hospitals were cutting back because of people getting benefits which simply is not the case