Isn't it the SMC that is evicting the current tenants? It seems to me that when the leases and agreements were drawn up those people at Hull City Council never envisaged that any future owner of the SMC would do anything for their own benefit, sporting or financial, to the detriment of the wider community.
Right I get it now, like you say they obviously never envisaged it but why was it not protected in the lease? Just a clause to say any decision on a change of usage would have to be approved by the council.