Is it a secret?Yes you did. And you commented on it. The Trust put Dutch in touch with flag suppliers and contributed money. I also sorted the payments, although that was under the auspices of HCSS.
Is it a secret?Yes you did. And you commented on it. The Trust put Dutch in touch with flag suppliers and contributed money. I also sorted the payments, although that was under the auspices of HCSS.
Is it a secret?
Dont think my posts get what i mean across. It the trust contributed 600 quid to a 600 quid banner then i would have no problem with the trusts name on it. It would be theirs.In my opinion, yes.
It opens up all sorts of issues, few if any I believe would be constructive.
Some people weren't in a position to contribute financially, but there opinions on the banner were welcomed and valued. Others needed to wait, and missed that opportunity, but their support was still valued.
I think a contest of who did what is detracting from the simple concept of the banner being a gesture from the fans to the team. I think that's something we need to keep as the focus.
Dont think my posts get what i mean across. It the trust contributed 600 quid to a 600 quid banner then i would have no problem with the trusts name on it. It would be theirs.
But this idea came up on here and you drove it forward. Ideally i dont want groups contributing, it should be a spontaneous gesture from individual fans under a not606 banner, whether thats ideas or money or whatever.
We were all aware, and perfectly happy for whoever wanted to contribute, to contribute. We were told about certain groups throwing some money in. The forum made it REALLY clear that it was to be a NOT606 banner, and they have been.
We also knew that HCSS helped out with the account, as well as knowing someone gave Dutch a heads up on a decent banner maker who would give a discount.
If that account was yours Al, thanks.
I can't work out the point of all your posts in this thread though. Are you looking for a pat on the head or something else?
A lot of people did a lot of stuff to make this happen, especially of course, Dutch and Mauled, but all of their help is gratefully acknowledged. What more do you want?
We were all aware, and perfectly happy for whoever wanted to contribute, to contribute. We were told about certain groups throwing some money in. The forum made it REALLY clear that it was to be a NOT606 banner, and they have been.
We also knew that HCSS helped out with the account, as well as knowing someone gave Dutch a heads up on a decent banner maker who would give a discount.
If that account was yours Al, thanks.
I can't work out the point of all your posts in this thread though. Are you looking for a pat on the head or something else?
A lot of people did a lot of stuff to make this happen, especially of course, Dutch and Mauled, but all of their help is gratefully acknowledged. What more do you want?
An amusing flame, but actually that wasn't the point. No one was after a "pat on the head" for their actions - **** knows, I'd be sorely disappointed if that was my reason for getting involved in City related stuff, based on what gets out-poured on here.Listen un-Happy, if you were to honest with yourself,you would realise that without the help(financial and effort) of the 'NO TO HULL TIGERS' lot, the flags made in support of Steve Bruce the players and the club,wouldn't have been possible.
And as I've said, we all knew CTWD/HCST threw some money in, along with many other people. T'was appreciated.An amusing flame, but actually that wasn't the point. No one was after a "pat on the head" for their actions - **** knows, I'd be sorely disappointed if that was my reason for getting involved in City related stuff, based on what gets out-poured on here.
My issue, which Dutch has addressed, was that some people took upon themselves to claim that the Trust had nothing at all to do with the flags, and those statements were left uncorrected. Which was a bit harsh, IMO.
Ok cheersAt this moment in time, there's no realistic way to contribute, I was waiting to see the feelings once the first ones were up.
It looks like there's a desire for more, so if anyone has an onine account we can use, it'd be great to hear from you.
Dutch, the same offer to handle the payments as before still stands from me.
Can you put payment details up again?
After this our next flag should have only one person. The 14th greatest captain in "Soccer" history, Ian Ashbee
"The least technically gifted man on this list perhaps, but don’t let that taint your view on Ian Ashbee as a great captain. Ashbee never won a World Cup, or a Ballon d’Or, or even a Champions League. He did win back-to-back promotions with Hull City before adding a third a couple of years later when the club won the 2008 play-off final though. This meant Ian Ashbee made history; the only man to ever captain a team through all four divisions of the football league.
Ashbee played over 200 games for Cambridge before joining the Tigers where he was sent off on his debut. Another five red cards would follow but did little to damage the appreciation he received from the club’s fans. He managed to tame his disciplinary problems as his career went on and in the nine years he captained Hull City he displayed exceptional leadership skills, instilling tremendous desire in those around him and guiding the club to the Premier League for the first time in their history."
The 15th greatest captain was Didier Deschamps and he came ahead of John Terry.
The links can be found on CI http://www.hullcityindependent.net/?page=forum&forum_id=8&thread_id=20945