Exactly, so why offer anything further until the name-change issue is put to bed - unless there is an acceptance for no-to-the name-change supporters in pushing their objections to one side and allowing Allam a moral victory - why the haste?
Why don't the club/SMC carry out the site survey that is required, then identify preferred display positions, then sort sizes, materials, fixings, etc. and then do a (staged) costing which can create a funding proposal that can be put to us and others? If the club will not fund the survey then that is another consideration. It's a fairly simple progression.
Fez, you know the basis behind these banners, if you don't agree with them, that's your choice, and you're perfectly entitled to it, but that basis won't change.
The banners are a pure and simple display of support for the team. The other arguments are being represented elsewhere. The decision from posters on here was to keep them well apart.
The way it's panned out so far has led to the possibility of further opportunities. I know you don't believe me, but the club have been really helpful. You've latched onto something that's possibly not even an issue. Rather than labour several minor points, the club and SMC looked at what can actually happen because it's within their control. They've been in touch with me today to mention some other possible options.
Repeating the same things to me, will only get you the same answers you don't believe. That's why I suggest you come and meet them and ask them the questions directly.
I'm not sure how much more fair and open than that I can be.
