Adam johnson arrested

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
FTM Dave said:
Talking from my own experience of being questioned by the cops after being nicked, it would go something like :

"Mr Johnson, have you engaged in sexual activity with ****** ******?"
"No I haven't".

"Mr Johnson, are you sure you have not engaged in sexual activity with ****** *****?"
"Absolutely not".

"Mr Johnson, I put it to you that you did engage in sexual activity with ***** *****. Is that correct?"
"Not all all".

REPEAT AD NAUSEUM

"Mr Johnson, it's a lovely day today isn't it?"
"Yes, it is".

"Mr Johnson, you must have enjoyed your hat-trick against Fulham".
"Yes, I did".

"Mr Johnson, what did you eat for breakfast on the day of the alledged offence?"
"I can't remember, but I always have a light breakfast as I'm a professional footballer".

"Mr Johnson, what did you have for lunch before you engaged in sexual activity with ****** ******?"
"I had pasta with tomato".

"SO YOU AGREE YOU ENGAGED IN SEXUAL ACITVITY WITH ****** ******".

And this is exactly why every brief in the land will advise a client to not answer the police questions.

If AJ did this he deserves everything he gets.

But innocent until proven guilty as many others have said, it could all be much ado about nothing. All of us are only speculating.
Click to expand...

And that slip up would be enough to bring charges regardless of weather he did it or not. Great post fella.
 
Spot on Funky - a relation of mine was walking along the street with his mate and his mate decided to kick a car wing mirror. The police arrived and the other lad owned up to it so they put him in the car he also told the police that my relation had nothing to do with it. My relation was then put in the car and told they were detaining him overnight in case the other lad changed his mind the next morning! He was released the next day without charge however his DNA is now on a database despite the fact that he had done nothing wrong.

Tell them f**k all unless/until you have to and the "You haven't anything to fear if your innocent" brigade need to have a real good think if one of them is asked to "help the police with their enquiries"

or in the words of the Police Sergeant (RIP) who lived opposite when I was a kid in the sixties "The police are there to protect the people from the criminals but who protects them from the police"
 
  • Like
Reactions: Deleted, its been fun thanks :), C19RK73 and 1 other person
Funky said:
And that slip up would be enough to bring charges regardless of weather he did it or not. Great post fella.
Click to expand...

I highly doubt the cps would authorise charge based on a slip up and not a single shred of evidence.

Itll be all the **** on his phone that proves it I bet. Personally I think hes ****ed and he'll never play football again.
 
DAPARKERSAFC said:
I highly doubt the cps would authorise charge based on a slip up and not a single shred of evidence.

Itll be all the **** on his phone that proves it I bet. Personally I think hes ****ed and he'll never play football again.
Click to expand...
So he's guilty until proven innocent? Nice one Parker!

The only proving "**** on his phone" would be if she's text him to say she's 15 before they had sex (if they had sex). Photos of a 15 year old sent by the 15 year old you didn't know was 15 is proof of nothing. Neither us messages saying "you were great last night" etc.

There is no evidence so far which is why he hasn't been charged. This is also why I am in full support of him, unlike yourself
 
DAPARKERSAFC said:
Not at all of course hes technically innocent untill proven guilty.

Im just saying I wouldnt be getting hopes up that he'll ever play again.
Click to expand...
So you have decided, based on press rubbish and zero hard evidence, that he's guilty?

I reckon there's very little in it. If anything. I think he may have shagged the lass but I doubt he knew her age beforehand. Just an opinion based on what I have seen written in papers and social media
 
Sounds odd to me. If he'd met her at a club training session he'd have known she was a schoolgirl and she'd presumably not have been tarted up. Different to meeting her in a club when she's got her glad rags and make up on and looks 5 years older.

Either he's a perv or she's a fantasist if you ask me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dispicable_Tel
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back