And that slip up would be enough to bring charges regardless of weather he did it or not. Great post fella.
You did, you actually posted that completely unrelated story. I'll repeat, the sexual exploitation of children has nothing to do with sex with an underage girl. Only an idiot wouldn't know the difference. Now go and look up the definition of exploitation you thick little 'tard
Spot on Funky - a relation of mine was walking along the street with his mate and his mate decided to kick a car wing mirror. The police arrived and the other lad owned up to it so they put him in the car he also told the police that my relation had nothing to do with it. My relation was then put in the car and told they were detaining him overnight in case the other lad changed his mind the next morning! He was released the next day without charge however his DNA is now on a database despite the fact that he had done nothing wrong. Tell them f**k all unless/until you have to and the "You haven't anything to fear if your innocent" brigade need to have a real good think if one of them is asked to "help the police with their enquiries" or in the words of the Police Sergeant (RIP) who lived opposite when I was a kid in the sixties "The police are there to protect the people from the criminals but who protects them from the police"
I highly doubt the cps would authorise charge based on a slip up and not a single shred of evidence. Itll be all the **** on his phone that proves it I bet. Personally I think hes ****ed and he'll never play football again.
So he's guilty until proven innocent? Nice one Parker! The only proving "**** on his phone" would be if she's text him to say she's 15 before they had sex (if they had sex). Photos of a 15 year old sent by the 15 year old you didn't know was 15 is proof of nothing. Neither us messages saying "you were great last night" etc. There is no evidence so far which is why he hasn't been charged. This is also why I am in full support of him, unlike yourself
Not at all of course hes technically innocent untill proven guilty. Im just saying I wouldnt be getting hopes up that he'll ever play again.
So you have decided, based on press rubbish and zero hard evidence, that he's guilty? I reckon there's very little in it. If anything. I think he may have shagged the lass but I doubt he knew her age beforehand. Just an opinion based on what I have seen written in papers and social media
If I were you mate, I'd stop in & keep my cock in my pants. You never know, it might happen to you one day.
Thankfully im a decent lad and married to a lovely 27 year old. Im not stupid enough or morally bankrupt that id get involved with a 15 year old girl.
Sounds odd to me. If he'd met her at a club training session he'd have known she was a schoolgirl and she'd presumably not have been tarted up. Different to meeting her in a club when she's got her glad rags and make up on and looks 5 years older. Either he's a perv or she's a fantasist if you ask me.
