Ah I see I mis interpreted it -KLP?By that quote he already is, "brought up through the academy"
Ah I see I mis interpreted it -KLP?By that quote he already is, "brought up through the academy"
Both the comments are equally ridiculous...
You must log in or register to see images
Something weird - 'Money owed by other clubs for transfers fell from £18m to £400k. This seems odd as only received £3.3m in cash'.
We paid £38k a week in interest on loans (almost £2m) and though the debt to the owner reduced by £2.5m, there's a new outside loan for £3m.
Is that £3m from the EFL?
As far as we know the EFL money was only about £500k and technically it's a grant, not a loan, there's no interest and it doesn't have to be repaid.
It would look a lot worse if we had stayed in League 1, the wage bill is more realistic now and we get 6M more TV money in the Championship, we have to stay up.We have debts of 40 million, most of it to the Allams
In the last year we lost 8 million ( due to covid ? )
We don't have much in the way of assets (things that could be sold for money)
There is not as much money owed to Hull City for players we sold earlier as some people thought
Not looking good
As far as we know the EFL money was only about £500k and technically it's a grant, not a loan, there's no interest and it doesn't have to be repaid.
So coming up to 11 years of Allam ownership City are still 39.5 million in debt to Allamhouse at a cost of 2 million per year in interest? how depressing
Honest question, do these account's influence any takeover bid i ask this question , because i cant see the club being sold for the outstanding amount on the accounts, unless the Allam's write off a large chunk of the debt, given especially, were we sit in the championship table.
Could this £20.5m be the SMC debt, so either the new buyer or council being liable?Loans to Allams of 39.5 mill. But debtors (owe the club money) of 20.5 mill, of which, according to note 11, 18 mill are group / related companies?? Net = c. 20mill.
Anyone on here understand the detail behind that?
AA said many a year ago the council had lost any control over the smc after allowing Pearson arf and Bartlett to get a mortgage on it.Could this £20.5m be the SMC debt, so either the new buyer or council being liable?
I hope I'm wrong but I worry the amount owed by the SMC could be problematic in the sale.
AA said many a year ago the council had lost any control over the smc after allowing Pearson arf and Bartlett to get a mortgage on it.
So I reckon that will come into it and it will get loaded with debt
I believe they've already said why and how ... in a nutshell, take us to PL, enjoy the ride & experience, then sell us as a PL club.All I think is why would anyone want to buy a football club?
How do the Turks make money out of us? They’re not doing it for altruistic reasons are they.
Don’t own our stadium, small capacity for a hopeful pl team.
Flaky supporters.
**** council who are shady as ****.
We’re like the fat bird at the end of the night in Tower.
Could this £20.5m be the SMC debt, so either the new buyer or council being liable?
I hope I'm wrong but I worry the amount owed by the SMC could be problematic in the sale.