So stop ****ing bleating on about it, you got your attention, well done.
Unless you're just making noise on the internet.
The irony...So stop ****ing bleating on about it, you got your attention, well done.
Unless you're just making noise on the internet.
The irony...So stop ****ing bleating on about it, you got your attention, well done. Just do it. Contact Mauled, get one made, contact James, find somewhere to put it.
It's really that simple.
Unless you're just making noise on the internet.
It's not that simple though.
1. there is nowhere in the stadium to put up a banner as big as the Bruce one.
2. i don't believe the club would allow a banner that says HULL CITY
3. James may not be able to keep to the things he says to supporters.

Is that a post to boost your post count?All possibly true, possibly not.
What is true, is we can have whatever we wanted on the banners. The banners exist as proof of that, with a few more to come.
You can have that too.![]()
All possibly true, possibly not.
What is true, is we can have whatever we wanted on the banners. The banners exist as proof of that, with a few more to come.
You can have that too.![]()
Do you even believe what you have posted there yourself ?
I suspect the existing, and in production banners should answer that for you.
In case I missed it (and so I don't have to scroll through the last ten pages) is there a banner in production with Hull City written on it?
No there isn't, and according to Dutch that's because no one wanted one. But if they did there would be no problem putting it up in the stadium .In case I missed it (and so I don't have to scroll through the last ten pages) is there a banner in production with Hull City written on it?
there is but because of lack of space it's been shortened to Hull Tigers

Why would there be? Noone suggested it in the polls of names of players, and therefore noone voted for it.In case I missed it (and so I don't have to scroll through the last ten pages) is there a banner in production with Hull City written on it?
In case I missed it (and so I don't have to scroll through the last ten pages) is there a banner in production with Hull City written on it?
Why would there be? Noone suggested it in the polls of names of players, and therefore noone voted for it.
You know, if its not too late Dutch, I'd be tempted to go with the following layout
Hull City
<awesome mauled artwork>
Legend(s)
Might shut the whiners up, at least for an hour or two.
Suggestions were put forward and majority decision won. As no one suggested Hull City then that is the only reason is hasn't been done. I suspect some wouldn't just want a simple Hull City banner but would require a '**** off Allam you twat' banner to be agreeable to the idea.
Suggestions were put forward and majority decision won. As no one suggested Hull City then that is the only reason is hasn't been done. I suspect some wouldn't just want a simple Hull City banner but would require a '**** off Allam you twat' banner to be agreeable to the idea.
The fact is the club wouldn't allow a simple "HULL CITY" banner to be displayed in a similar way to the Steve Bruce one
As long as we all recognise that and not pretend that they would if only we had voted on it
Why do you need to know what an individual thinks of that situation? Is it because then you can then negate their views on everything else based on what they think about one area?
This is about flags showing support for the team Hull City. If anyone chooses to make it about something else and their own personal agendas is up to them. But by trying to derail something positive at a time when positivity, dialogue and building bridges is needed then that is a sad state of affairs.
Is there something wrong with me asking you that question; have you not discussed it on here previously? No, it is so I can understand why you made the comments you did and who they might refer to. (I'm guessing your comments were aimed at me and others?). Would you like to point out where I have negated other folk's views based on what they think about that one area. That is a big statement Charlie1, can you support it, as I find it offensive?
It would seem it depends on what is on the flag, it will be either supportive or in protest, apparently. It's not about personal agendas, it's about opinions, just as you are expressing yours now, have done in the past and I am sure you will do again in the future.
The sad state of affairs is the continuing debacle of the name-change controversy. I would remind you that I have not tried to derail anything, I supported the original banner for all of the reasons given on here, I had no input, as I promised, into the second banner thread and it took it's course and somehow reached a consensus; the PayPal thread is there and I have not seen anyone hindered from making their payments - have you? How is my discussing the issue on a forum an attempted derailment?
I agree that 'positivity, dialogue and building bridges is needed', I think we (the supporters) tried to show how we wished to achieve and encourage that with the first and second banners - our reward was a continuation of the name-change application and an interview with Ehab Allam that was insuting and the total opposite of 'positivity, dialogue and building bridges' - or did you believe otherwise? Do you not think everything is very one-sided? Do you not have some concern about throwing more of the supporters money at this project when we still do not have answers on where the missing Away Supporters Initiative Fund is? I am all for cooperation and support, but it really does, at some point or another, need to be a two-way street.
Is there something wrong with me asking you that question; have you not discussed it on here previously? No, it is so I can understand why you made the comments you did and who they might refer to. (I'm guessing your comments were aimed at me and others?). Would you like to point out where I have negated other folk's views based on what they think about that one area. That is a big statement Charlie1, can you support it, as I find it offensive?
It would seem it depends on what is on the flag, it will be either supportive or in protest, apparently. It's not about personal agendas, it's about opinions, just as you are expressing yours now, have done in the past and I am sure you will do again in the future.
The sad state of affairs is the continuing debacle of the name-change controversy. I would remind you that I have not tried to derail anything, I supported the original banner for all of the reasons given on here, I had no input, as I promised, into the second banner thread and it took it's course and somehow reached a consensus; the PayPal thread is there and I have not seen anyone hindered from making their payments - have you? How is my discussing the issue on a forum an attempted derailment?
I agree that 'positivity, dialogue and building bridges is needed', I think we (the supporters) tried to show how we wished to achieve and encourage that with the first and second banners - our reward was a continuation of the name-change application and an interview with Ehab Allam that was insuting and the total opposite of 'positivity, dialogue and building bridges' - or did you believe otherwise? Do you not think everything is very one-sided? Do you not have some concern about throwing more of the supporters money at this project when we still do not have answers on where the missing Away Supporters Initiative Fund is? I am all for cooperation and support, but it really does, at some point or another, need to be a two-way street.