So when Cartwright is back we're selling Ingram?
My point is yes he's a good talent but he's not going to play.
He'll play in the 21's won't he? and be on the bench when either Baxter or Ingram are out. Most championship squads have 3 keepers.
So when Cartwright is back we're selling Ingram?
My point is yes he's a good talent but he's not going to play.
He'll be in the first team, like Ingram and Baxter he'll have to convince the staff he can cut it. But a three year deal with an option suggests a lot of potential.
I'm well aware it's your opinion it was my first sentence. I'm just a bit frustrated that mere weeks after having a go at me for suggesting he might leave you're suggesting there's a chance too.
I think he'll stay at least this season and if we sell it'll be far more than 8m.
Bowen is being linked to arsenal for the same price Maguire went to United for, so no I don't think you can say a good CB goes for half the price of an attacker.
He'll play in the 21's won't he? and be on the bench when either Baxter or Ingram are out. Most championship squads have 3 keepers.
1 - I never had a go at you, I asked you to explain why you'd come to that conclusion from a run of the mill typical sound bite comment.
2- I've not suggested he's leaving ( there's always a chance any player can / leave )
3- the fact you are using the Maguire fee and Bowen fee to say defenders go for the same fees as attackers is laughable.... Bowen was a championship player moving to the prem and Maguire was ( at the time ) one of the best CBs in the country and man utd vastly over paid. If your going to try and use something to prove your argument at least do better then that and compare apples to apples at least.
I'm well aware it's your opinion it was my first sentence. I'm just a bit frustrated that mere weeks after having a go at me for suggesting he might leave you're suggesting there's a chance too.
I think he'll stay at least this season and if we sell it'll be far more than 8m.
Bowen is being linked to arsenal for the same price Maguire went to United for, so no I don't think you can say a good CB goes for half the price of an attacker.
So when Cartwright is back we're selling Ingram?
My point is yes he's a good talent but he's not going to play.
Can't think of many that have three competing for a starting spot, can you name some examples?
Theres a chance anyone could leave. Everyone in football has a price, but HT2 just said from what he's heard Greaves isn't looking for a move.
Selling Ingram....What the hell are you going on about now? Why do you constantly come out with such ridiculous statements from such trivial things....
Then why suggest we'd be open to offers over 8m? Seems a strange comment to make.
He's just speculating that that's the kind of bid we might start thinking about if one comes in.
Are you having a go? Just want to clarify..
I'm asking about the fact we'd have four senior keepers in the summer as we have an option on Baxter. It's a simple question. Why the overreaction?
Clearly one or the other will probably be out on loan next season for experience.
Are you having a go? Just want to clarify..
I'm asking about the fact we'd have four senior keepers in the summer as we have an option on Baxter. It's a simple question. Why the overreaction?
Why Ingram?
Who says we'll take up the option on Baxter?
We might let Harvey go out on load again or could seek him?
Robson isn't good enough to contend yet..
You just jump to wild conclusions for no apparent reason sometimes
But when I speculated that he might not sign a new deal I was making mountains out of molehills? I see.
In your opinion.
I remember when we sold KLP plenty on here were saying it was ok as Greaves was a better player.
To suggest we'd sell him for anything south of 12-15m is madness.
Didn't you accuse me of making a mountain out of a molehill when I suggested the club seemed uncertain about keeping him and now here you are suggesting we might sell him for around 8m?
Didn't you just say 'To suggest we'd sell him for anything south of 12-15m is madness.'? Either way, you're completely against 8 million but 10 million would be fine? Doesn't seem a great argumentYes, 10-12 is, not 8.